User talk:Hhk2007

Welcome!

Hello, Hhk2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 01:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Ones

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Royal Ones, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Royal Ones. nancy ^(talk) 20:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging Royal Ones for further review

Hello, Hhk2007 … I recently encountered the article about Royal Ones and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for one of the following guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia: Academics, Biographies, Organizations and companies, Fiction, Music, Schools, Web content, or several proposals for new guidelines, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor. Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 01:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is interesting ... I don't remember having dealt with a neologism before ... OTOH, Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms seems rather specific.

I'm flagging this article partly to "stress the robustness" of my Protocols for deletion warnings ... this is New Territory for me, except to say that "without reliable source citations of the use of this neologism, it's GOT TO GO" ... Wikipedia is full of things that I've never heard of before, so I'm not prejudiced against its inclusion; I just need verification. :-) —72.75.72.63 (talk) 01:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]