User talk:Hhfjbaker/Archives/2023/07 (July)
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Hhfjbaker. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Battle of Nashville I think i have dropped into your article
Sorry, I have removed in Battle of Nashville part that didn't make any sense, Hood's army had suffered heavy but I see that you are doing work in progress. Kanikosen (talk) 17:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- No prob. Thanks! Boo Boo (talk) 17:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Notes/References
Hi there. Please don't impose broad formatting across many articles without floating it in a talk format first. Especially when it comes to Featured Articles. The Notes/References headers are there according to MOS. Notes and References are the correct headers for those sections. References/Bibliography are you've changed it is incorrect. Please seek some consensus before making changes across a broad swath of articles Historical Perspective 2 (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies, started to go through trying to follow MOS and somehow got references and bibliography backwards. Thanks!Boo Boo (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also, you might consider using {{efn}} instead of note tag. IMO of course, it is easier to use and produces a nicer result, because it produces alphabetic-sequence references whereas note-tag generates number-sequence references like <ref>. Of course if an article has a clearly established style, you have to follow it (unless you can secure consensus for change at the talk page). Just my 2¢ worth. If you want to see the effect, try Calendar (New Style) Act 1750, which as many references and many explanatory notes. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Boo Boo (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also, you might consider using {{efn}} instead of note tag. IMO of course, it is easier to use and produces a nicer result, because it produces alphabetic-sequence references whereas note-tag generates number-sequence references like <ref>. Of course if an article has a clearly established style, you have to follow it (unless you can secure consensus for change at the talk page). Just my 2¢ worth. If you want to see the effect, try Calendar (New Style) Act 1750, which as many references and many explanatory notes. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Hhfjbaker. You've added references byo "Wineman 2013" to 154th New York Infantry Regiment, but no such work is defined in the article. Could you add the cite to the References section or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Wineman, Bradford A. (2013). The Chancellorsville Campaign, January–May 1863, CMH Pub 75-9 (PDF). Campaigns of the Civil War (1st ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Army, Center of Military History. pp. 1–48. OCLC 847739804. GPO SerNo 008-029-00555-7. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
- It's from CMH's Campaigns of the Civil War series. Boo Boo (talk) 17:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)