User talk:Hhfbms1014

January 2022

Hello, I'm Bongwarrior. I noticed that you recently removed content from Faisal bin Mishaal Al Saud without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faisal bin Mishaal Al Saud. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 11:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hhfbms1014 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the information we removed is of the higher authority of our region and on his request we removed the content, if you want we can communicate with you via our official email and request content removal please let us know Regards

Decline reason:

Wikipedia business is generally not handled by email, it is handled on Wikipedia for openness and transparency if at all possible. Whether there is an article about the Prince or not is not solely up to him; if someone meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources, they merit an article, their wishes don't usually factor into it. If you or the Prince wish to argue that he does not meet the notability definition(which would be hard as he holds a public office and is a member of a royal family), that argument can be made, or if there are errors in the article, we want to know what they are, but you cannot just blank the article without discussion. Repeatedly doing so is called edit warring and not permitted. Please read about conflict of interest, paid editing, and how to make edit requests and tell us how your future contributions will be consistent with those policies. I am declining your request at this time. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.