User talk:Hgourvest

This edit is not vandalism, nor was a previous one you reverted on vandalism grounds. The IP editor is correct in that CDisplayEx is unrelated in code to CDisplay. Despite being present for many months in the article, it's really undue weight to the application.

If you like CDisplayEx so much why not create an article for it? Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I've just noticed that you placed a vandalism template on the IP's talk page. I've removed it as these edits are not vandalism. Please also assume good faith in other editors. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please join in the discussion on the talk page before re-adding the CDisplayEx information, as per WP:BRD. Continual addition could be classed as edit warring and result in blocks. Thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CDisplayEx is a redevelopment of CDisplay, because original autor is dead. What is wrong ?

Hello, Hgourvest. You have new messages at Chaheel Riens's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This edit is not vandalism either. Just because you disagree with an edit does not make it a disruptive edit. Please join in the discussion, and put forward your arguments there. Please also read wp:brd and wp:coi while you're at it. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic CDisplay. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at CDisplay, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 14:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hgourvest. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 14:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently posted information speculating on the real life identity of an anonymous IP address. That is considered WP:OUTING and is grounds for immediate blocking. I suspect that it was not your intent, but OUTING is considered Wikipedia:Harassment. Please do not repeat that behavior. Toddst1 (talk) 15:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hgourvest. You have new messages at Talk:CDisplay.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.