User talk:Heymid/2011 March

Hullo

Welcome back! Glad the retirement wasn't permanent :) --Errant ^(chat!) 15:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks mate! I hope a month was enough. :) Glad to see you as an administrator! HeyMid (contribs) 15:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Heh, thanks. Still not sure how that came about :P --Errant ^(chat!) 15:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Sam Fuld

Hi Heymid. How are you? I've given you a GA review at Talk:Sam Fuld/GA1. Have fun. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

I can never receive sufficient notices, when the news is good news.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Cheers, HeyMid (contribs) 18:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Elitserien/Kvalserien

Hello again. Since the games in 2011 Kvalserien will soon start, I no longer think the 2010 Kvalserien subsection belongs to the 2010–11 season. Because of the timeline of the played games (March and April 2010), I moved the Kvalserien page to 2009–10 Elitserien season and I hope that is a solution that works for you. If it isn't, let's find a compromise that works for us both. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not sure whether this was the right move. My reason for having the 2010 Kvalserien table in the 2010–11 Elitserien season article was because the 2010 Kvalserien is the qualification for the 2010–11 Elitserien season. Your system – which is seemingly based on year – doesn't seem to be a good alternative. I suggest that we either keep my original setup or that we remove the Kvalserien tables from the Elitserien season articles altogether. HeyMid (contribs) 09:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

How about having a very brief comment about the results of that Kvalserien in the first section of the 2010–11 Elitserien season? Maybe something like this:

In Kvalserien Södertälje SK and AIK qualified for Elitserien play for the 2010–11 season.

I feel that the Elitserien current season page gets somewhat cluttered with the Kvalserien table, but have no problems with information about Kvalserien being there. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 09:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

That is OK for me. No actual opinion, but if you add that to the article, fine for me. HeyMid (contribs) 09:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I have updated the articles accordingly. Thanks. HeyMid (contribs) 09:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

|extra

Re this - there's not much point adding a parameter without documenting it. Please add a little note to the doc. cheers, Rd232 ^talk 14:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Fuld again

Hey Heymid, nice work on Fuld. Thanks to yours and Epeefleche's efforts, I've passed the GA review! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Here, have a userbox :)

This user helped promote Sam Fuld to good article status.