Jump to content

User talk:HermioneJapardi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, HermioneJapardi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 19:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section Size

The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

< 15,000 characters medium size > 30,000 characters
one or two paragraphs   two or three paragraphs   three or four paragraphs
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Zodiac articles

[edit]

I noticed that almost all of your edits have been in this area, and as a new editor you may not be aware of article talk pages. There is currently a request for comment on whether articles about zodiac signs should include lists of people. You may wish to join the discussion. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 13:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited October 26, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese zodiac

[edit]

Hi! I've seen that you've been adding a lot of peoples to the articles related to Chinese zodiac. It's nice to see that you've got a huge passion towards those articles but I would recommend you to watch the birth dates too (not only years) from Chinese calendar before adding new peoples to those lists to make sure that the information is correct. As an example you added Pep Guardiola who's born in 18 January 1971 on the list in Pig's article, despite he's not born during Year of the Pig (Year of the Pig began at 27 January in 1971). Santtu37 (talk) 19:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HermioneJapardi, in case you're not aware of this, you should know that erasing Santtu37's post from your talk page doesn't make it 'go away', but rather serves as an acknowledgement that you have read it. Please stop adding people who do not belong to these articles. Continuing to do so will be considered disruptive editing. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@HermioneJapardi: You might not have noticed, but there's a current request for comments that's about to come to an end, and will almost certainly result in the removal of these lists from all Chinese zodiac articles. Feel free to comment there, but be aware that it is unlikely to alter the outcome at this point. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]