User talk:HermeticScholar

Web links

Please don't revert my improvements to the weblinks; they should correspond to what the site itself title itself in the title bar, perhaps with a subtitle from the page itself. -999 (Talk) 23:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trademark section

I don't understand why you multiple cited this section when I had no problem with the citation pointing to the order website page which contains all the information. I still think it would be better not to mention the contract. That opens the door for opposing parties to mention that it is disputed by citing the lawsuit, which also can be documented with a link to a court site. Wouldn't it be better for both sides to leave it out until it is resolved, then record the outcome? -999 (Talk) 23:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked this account indefinite as a sock puppet based on this series of edits. If that was a mistake, please send me an e-mail explaining the sequence and provide some evidence that you are a different person than User:Zanoni666. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 02:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]