User talk:Herizora

Rudeness

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your tone on Talk:Nifedipine and in edit summaries (e.g. "asshole" to Boghog[1]) is unacceptable. JFW | T@lk 08:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

It is generally not acceptable to remove warnings such as the one above, per WP:TALK. It definitely not acceptable to dismiss them with a rude edit summary, such as "unnecessary whine".[2]

Once again, you risk your account being blocked for lack of civility. This kind of attitude wouldn't be tolerated in real life, and it is isn't tolerated here. JFW | T@lk 11:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear Jfdwolff, go fuck yourself. Cheers. Herizora (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Now, you basically have two choices: 1- You will denounce me for being a bad mouthed editor (in my own talk page) in order to take this profile down; 2- You will consider thinking about the reasons why I have been trying to actually contribute to Wikipedia by adding the most up-to-date and accurate interpretation of medical science.

I have no problem discussing any subject. However I do have a problem with arbitrary rules. Herizora (talk) 12:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

This is not an arbitrary rule. WP:NPA is Wikipedia policy. There are not very many absolute rules around here but this is one of them. Furthermore your response is completely unacceptable. Civility between editors is an essential component of Wikipedia. Based on your attitude and the way you interact with fellow editors, I really don't think Wikipeda is the right place for you. Boghog (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more, barnstar boy. I wish there was a way of deleting a Wikipedia profile. If you can do it, please go ahead. Herizora (talk) 13:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Too bad. It would be a shame to loose an editor that clearly has a lot to contribute. At the same time, it is essential that you follow Wikipedia policies. If you really want to delete your account, you can try WP:VANISH. But it might be better to first take a short wikibreak before taking such a drastic action. Boghog (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Human adrenals immunostained for neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Human adrenals immunostained for neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 5 April 2015 (UTC)