User talk:Hergirl848ikiwdudet

This user enjoys biting newbies and vandals, and you are next.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Hersfold, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Airplaneman ^talk 03:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Hersfold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mlpearc MESSAGE 03:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Hergirl848ikiwdudet, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Airplaneman ^talk 03:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked for disruptive behavior. Please go play your games elsewhere. You may appeal this block with {{unblock|your reason here}}. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hergirl848ikiwdudet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand. I have vandalized your page for no reason, really. Although it may seem as if I will not contribute here, I will. The stuff I put on my page was testing out the features here. Speaking of which, can I get a tour? I understand that I have vandalized, and I will only contribute with good faith here at wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your contributions, and I was not able to find any evidence that unblocking this account would be likely to lead to a better encyclopedia. Your request does not give any reason to believe that unblocking this account would be likely to lead to a better encyclopedia; indeed, there is no evidence that you even understand the basic purpose of the project. In the future, when you are beginning at other web sites, looking for a link marked 'help' is usually a better way to learn about a new website than simply randomly insulting people and vandalizing things. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{helpme}} I do not understand the buttons at the top.

Wait for the unblock to be reviewed, please. fetchcomms☛ 00:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Antapanta45 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth