User talk:Heraldfranciscojarquin1993
Welcome!
|
Jinotega
[edit]Could you please stop adding irrelevant pictures to the article Jinotega? Wikipedia is not a tourist guide of photo album. The Banner talk 19:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Jinotega
[edit]Could you please add only useful pictures to the article Jinotega? Multiple pictures of the pavement are not useful. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images. The Banner talk 01:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Jinotega again
[edit]¿Es posible que sus retiros mediante la colocación de fotos de pavimento, en lugar de texto en idioma español y el desplazamiento sin sentido de Jinotega? Este proyecto es un comportamiento bastante competitivo. Ese comportamiento, en el que se está utilizando ya sea una IP y una cuenta es que ahora hay una protección parcial es en el artículo. Así que por favor: ¡Espera! The Banner talk 20:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC) And excuse my Google Translate spanish
March 2015
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jinotega. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jinotega. warningL stop your editwarring and disruptive editing. Next time you do that you will be blocked. The Banner talk 19:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
AN/I
[edit]For your information: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Jinotega. This is a discussion about your disruptive editing at Jinotega with the purpose of getting you blocked long term. The Banner talk 20:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 01:00, 23 March 2015 (UTC)