User talk:Henrytoxteth15

November 2021

Hello. Your recent edit to Caspar appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. And please read WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 23:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Soraya Saga, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Henrytoxteth15, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Henrytoxteth15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Caspar Alpsten for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caspar Alpsten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caspar Alpsten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for misusing Wikipedia for advertising or promotional purposes, and for abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]