User talk:Henryshrigleyfeigl

Welcome!

Hello, Henryshrigleyfeigl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Marjorie Goodwin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marjorie Goodwin

I hope you will decide to continue work on an article about Marjorie Cussons.

As a new editor, it must look to you like we were abrupt and not very appreciative of the work you put into the start of the article.

I'd like you to see it through my eyes:

I reviewed over 200 proposed articles today. Most were close to worthless. We get several hundred new submissions every day. While it would be nice if we could spend hours on each one, identifying how they could be improved, our experience tells us that in most cases, it is a monumental waste of time.

The article on Marjorie Cussons may well be the exception, but as I mentioned, at the time I saw it, there were no references to reliable sources, which is an absolute requirement, and no mention of her connection to the WWF, which may well be why she deserves an article.

The good news is that it is easily fixed, and if you want to work on the article more, I can retrieve it for you, and place it in a location which will not get deleted quickly.

Then I'll urge you to visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse, where experienced editors will be happy to help with the critical issue of references, and other issues such as the standard structure of articles.--S Philbrick (Talk) 20:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Henryshrigleyfeigl/Marjorie Goodwin --S Philbrick (Talk) 20:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the liberty to perform some minor formatting and cleanup work on it. It won't be accepted for publication in main article space until it cites multiple reliable sources, however. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks to both of you for your helpful comments and the formatting. I will continue to work on the article and please let me know if I am not getting it right. Henryshrigleyfeigl (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing can be tricky for new editors, please check out Help:Referencing for beginners for assistance.--S Philbrick (Talk) 12:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Piesse and Lubin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Piesse and Lubin. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piesse and Lubin (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Piesse and Lubin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 05:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Henryshrigleyfeigl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades^Godric 05:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piesse and Lubin has been accepted

Piesse and Lubin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JSFarman (talk) 03:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marjorie Cussons has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marjorie Cussons. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marjorie Cussons (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is entirely too much reliance on PRIMARY sources such as the family's personal collections, letters/correspondence, etc. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marjorie Cussons and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Marjorie Cussons concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marjorie Cussons, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marjorie Cussons (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article needs serious work on its sourcing. I was unable to verify the existence of the autobiography (no Google hits, no record in the British Library), whatever "PZ Interlink" is also has no Google hits, and most of the remaining sources are very minor/trivial for someone apparently prominent in business. Had it not been for these issues, I would have accepted based on the article content: if the sourcing is fixed up and resubmitted, I see no reason not to accept it then.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marjorie Cussons and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marjorie Cussons, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]