User talk:Henry.R1

Welcome!

Hello, Henry.R1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 12:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Questionable references

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted a questionable reference that you recently added to Business ethics: it was a book from an obscure publisher that is not held by any libraries in WorldCat nor cited by anyone in Google Scholar.

Then I looked at your editing history and saw that yesterday GeoWriter had reverted a reference that you added to Eocene as "unreliable". Then I looked at your other edits and saw many other strange and questionable references: for example, Special:Diff/968789504, just like the aforementioned reference you cited in Business ethics, is a book from an obscure publisher that is not held by any libraries in WorldCat nor cited by anyone in Google Scholar, and even stranger is that in the URL field of the reference you inserted a Wayback Machine copy of the Google Books page for this obscure book. There is no need to cite an archived copy of a Google Books page. (Wayback Machine doesn't archive a whole book from Google Books!) Moreover, the Google Books page shows that the book was published via Lulu.com, which means that the book was self-published, which is even more questionable.

Why are you citing such questionable sources in strange ways?

If you need more information on how to identify reliable sources, see:

Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 12:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As Biogeographist notes, there seems to be a large number of odd references you've added. I opened a discussion on "Ed-Tech Press" at WP:RSN here recently. I'm in the process of cleaning up these references, and I noticed four of the first five were added by you. Do you have some connection to this "publisher"? Kuru (talk) 03:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Appreciate the feedback given and the apologize on mesh up the pages which need you and other expert to do clean up. Thanks to the pages sharing. Many to learn! Henry.R1 (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]