User talk:HendrikJan1968

Welcome

Hello, HendrikJan1968, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 13:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Please stop with pushing you're personal opinion above sources and claiming that sources are not good just because it does not fit you're personal opinion. Bending sources so that it will fit you're opinion is not productive, nor in discussion something nor in editing. Stop reverting and calling good edits vandalism just because you don't agree with it, otherwise you may get blocked. Stating something without real backing of sources does not help the further long any real discusion or underpin you're arguments. Please argument and engage a talk page with real underlying sources, not just you're opinion. DagneyGirl (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

You are the one who’s removing existing sourced information without explaining why. The Dutch names were already mentioned, as well as the fact that they’re considered archaic. You removed the last part without any agreement. You are the one who should engage on a talk page before making these disruptive edits. HendrikJan1968 (talk) 10:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Again stop making bold claims without backing in anyway. They are not archaic, that's you're own opinion not fact. Also removing whole a text just you're personal believe something without sources is not done.. DagneyGirl (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello HendrikJan1968, you mentioned "... the fact that they’re considered archaic. ..." It could be you consider something archaic, but the external link you gave here and some related edits, does not prove what you think is a fact. I would say, that external link is a strong indication that you mentioned in the article was incorrect. I agree with DagneyGirl that with this series of edits you were giving the readers incorrect information and you better stop this. - Robotje (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Warning for

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wytgaard, you may be blocked from editing. DagneyGirl (talk) 11:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Warning for

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Damwâld. DagneyGirl (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)