User talk:Helpfoss/Comparison of BitTorrent clients
Appearance
Howto sort a column according to date
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am working on the User:Helpfoss/Comparison_of_BitTorrent_clients. I am looking for a way to make the columns First public release date and Latest stable
- sortable for the date instead of the version number; the latter being completely unimportant for this overview
- automatically updated from project homepage or wikipedia article page, if there is one
Issue no2 is I think already solved, issue no1 remains. Helpfoss (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- since I worked many times on this template and other comparison: don't! Version numbering is not telling anything of usablibity of the application (you should know) and date would be an interesting part, but this has be be a reporgraammint of the "template:Latest stable software release" which is not existing, so Template:infobox software need a reprogramming, whcih would solve your problem. in a few days (I do not promise anything) I will have a look at! I will leave the helpme-template open for further suggestions! mabdul 00:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- The template that would have to be changed is {{LSR}}, but I can't see a way to do it without also changing all the templates that use it. I'll post at Template talk:LSR, just in case, but I think your best workaround is to make that column unsortable. Sorry! -- John of Reading (talk) 07:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yes I do mean that template. The problem is that this template would be sortable only if the displaying data would change... or wait. maybe with the another template this would be possible. let me check something in a few minutes. mabdul 00:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- The template that would have to be changed is {{LSR}}, but I can't see a way to do it without also changing all the templates that use it. I'll post at Template talk:LSR, just in case, but I think your best workaround is to make that column unsortable. Sorry! -- John of Reading (talk) 07:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)