User talk:Hellobyehowareyou

June 2020

Hello, I'm Eumat114. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sugar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 10:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to GAIS. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 08:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Luqman meteor

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Luqman meteor, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 08:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to GAIS, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 08:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked and I am very very sorry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hellobyehowareyou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I shouldn't have done what I did and I am really sorry I wanted to edit a mistake in a page (not bad edit) and i found out i was blocked Hellobyehowareyou (talk) 08:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not give me sufficient assurance that you will not make bad edits in the future. Please describe the edit or edits you wish to make, and explain why you did what you did before. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.