User talk:Helloaraanalytics

This is Helloaraanalytics's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 本杰明摩尔 (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

The submission appears to be written in Chinese. This is the English-language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English-language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Chinese Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:本杰明摩尔 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Helloaraanalytics! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful when you copyedit

Hi Helloaraanalytics, thank you for your contributions. You have been making many rapid edits to different articles, adding or removing a few words, removing punctuation, or making other sentence-level changes; unfortunately, not all of them are correct, and I'd like to ask you to be much more careful, and make sure that you read the text after you have edited it. For instance:

here you changed "scent formula" to "scented formula" which is something different.
here you made a few changes, some of them OK, but "who" should not have been changed to "which" (and I'm sure you would have seen that if you'd checked the text afterwards). Changing "behaviors" to "behaviours" and similar changes from one correct English spelling to another one should only be done if it is in line with this guideline. My personal preference is UK/Commonwealth spelling, like you use, but that doesn't mean that it is more "correct" than any other English variety.
here you also changed the variety of English (from "color" to "colour") which is not appropriate in an article about a restaurant in the US. And here, you made a spelling change in an article about an Australian company; "recognisable" is the Australian spelling, and shouldn't be changed to "recognizable".
here you changed "The 10 films he directed [...] were produced" to "The ten films he directed [...] was produced"; changing "10" to "ten" is fine, but the verb was correct before and incorrect after your change.

These are just some examples – I don't want to sound discouraging, but it actually creates more work for your fellow editors if you make lots of small changes very quickly, and without making sure that your changes are correct. Since some of your changes are correct, they will have to be checked one by one. If you are using a grammar checking tool, you have to be even more careful; most of the changes any such tool suggests are going to be either incorrect or pointless. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea I've also seen edits adding grammatical errors. I'm not sure what to do about this if it continues. Doug Weller talk 13:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for your inconvenience. I am aware of these mistakes. We will make sure it does NOT happen again. 72.69.150.89 (talk) 03:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for your inconvenience. I am aware of these mistakes. We will make sure it does NOT happen again. Helloaraanalytics (talk) 03:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Helloaraanalytics! Your additions to Fake fur have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio - again

Please do not add copyrighted lyrics to articles, as you did to the article I Was a Lover, a Leader of Men. This is a copyright violation, and goes against Wikipedia's non-free content policy and general content policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for your message, I would be more careful next time. Helloaraanalytics (talk) 20:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:本杰明摩尔

Hello, Helloaraanalytics. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:本杰明摩尔, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:本杰明摩尔

Hello, Helloaraanalytics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "本杰明摩尔".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]