User talk:HelloThereNow

Welcome!

Hello, HelloThereNow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

I noticed you have been working on the Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. article. Thanks for helping out. Unfortunately, however, I had to revert a couple of your changes, as the article was previously tagged as reading like an advertisement for the company. Please check the discussions on the talk page. Dansiman (talk|Contribs) 01:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ralph Nader. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --John (talk) 02:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scandal Reverts

Why do you persist in your apparent campaign for adding this information regarding the former AG ministers. Here are a few thoughts:

1. The page in question is about the World Assemblies of God, NOT the Assemblies of God of USA, to which two of your four targets would have been affiliated. Frank Houston was a minister of the AOG of Australia.

2. According to research Morris Cerullo has never been an AG minister.

3. There already exist a page which details the failings of high profile ministers.

4. They were not leaders of the AG. Being ordained by the AG does not make them leaders of that organisation.

5. Why are you only targeting AG ministers. What about the current Pope, some say he was a Nazi sympathiser or what about Rowan Williams of the Church of England?

6. The quality of your work was very poor and not in keeping with that of an encyclopaedia.

RegardPaulrach (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Form

It is incredibly bad form and bad manners to remove members comments without having the courtesy to respond to them. Especially as one of those was a warning from an administrator about your conduct. Paulrach (talk) 07:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kach and Kahane Chai

Please stop removing the article from Category:Jewish terrorism. It clearly deserves to be in the category; it's a Jewish group which is classed as a terrorist organisation in numerous countries. Please remember to adhere to WP:NPOV when editing. Thanks, пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 07:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

QWERTYtheman

Are you also editing as QWERTYtheman? I noticed that your writing style, topic selection, and editing choices are quite similar. - Dravecky (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joe Francis

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Joe Francis. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Francis. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]