User talk:HelloGrandGuy

Welcome!

Hello, HelloGrandGuy!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, OnlyNano 20:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your article: Sinac

Hey there! I noticed you're starting off your journey on Wikipedia by creating an article, which I saw (Sinac). That's really exciting! If you need any help with the article (I will help with contributions as well, as it seems like an interesting place), please shoot me a message on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as possible! OnlyNano 20:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello HelloGrandGuy! Your additions to Draft:Almissani have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you tell me where the copyrighted material is so i can remove it? thank you! HelloGrandGuy (talk) 19:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the version that had the copyvio. The currect version does not appear to have any copyright issues. — Diannaa (talk) 19:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almissani (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Almissani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HelloGrandGuy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you please tell me the specific details on how to expand my article for it to get accepted on wikipedia HelloGrandGuy (talk) 20:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HelloGrandGuy you have a single primary source, that does not prove the company meets our notability requirements for organisations.

The entire draft is also a thinly disguised advert for the company, which is prohibited on Wikipedia.

Are you employed by the company, perchance? Qcne (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i will add more sources thank you for that

and no not at all im an independent writer HelloGrandGuy (talk) 20:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mladen Marušić moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mladen Marušić. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 13:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well the source i have is the son of mladen marušić i dont know what else you need because theres only 1 or 2 sources that i can link in the article HelloGrandGuy (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mladen Marušić (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We'd need a few more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mladen Marušić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how many sources HelloGrandGuy (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Our standard is three independent sources @HelloGrandGuy. As long as they are published they can be offline (such as books). Qcne (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]