User talk:Helliko
This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Welcome Helliko!
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
August 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of countries by number of Internet users may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |align=left | {{flag |Mexico}}<ref>[http://www.cnnexpansion.com/tecnologia/2013/07/31/mexico-tiene-52-millones-de-internautas.</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback Tool update
[edit]Hey Helliko. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit]Edit summaries
[edit]Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220 of Borg 03:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Previewing
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Adding "internal" to the page name in a 'Main article' template 'broke' the template, which then shows up as red, if you preview before saving you can see this. 220 of Borg 03:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 14 May
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of ongoing armed conflicts page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of the Shaer gas field may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of the Shaer gas field may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen
[edit]Hey Helliko, I undid your last modification in Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen
You have 2 problems, pleas provide a source/reason for every edit that might have complains about it, the other reason is you did not close the citation tag, in order to provide a correct format you need to close each tag you use such as HTML,
<tag> this is the openning
and the other tags inside the tag should be closed as well
</tag>this is the closing
and if you don't like head ache you can easily use the Wikipedia visual editor that does all the coding for you.
I am not a member of the Wikipedia support team, but you can ask me any time in my talk page or mail me for any help you need, I will be happy to.
YemArabSf (talk) 17:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)