User talk:Hell Hawk
March 2010
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of unusual deaths, you will be blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- I am going to revert your removal because you clearly don't want it there. There was consensus on the talk page for keeping it and I saw that you didn't agree with it being there. Doing this against a consensus is counterproductive. Please don't revert it as I will happily start a discussion on the talk page of the article with you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for assuming that. Still, you should provide an edit summary. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that you weren't giving a summary followed the lines of typical vandalism. Because I didn't know your intentions, I assumed the worst. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. yandman 13:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
List of ancient monoliths
[edit]Your latest revert is WP:Circular. Look, I have put much effort and thought into creating the list. Do you seriously believe I would just stand by and watch how you start a little edit war without you having a real grasp of the topic? Then you probably also believe that Micky Mouse was a Communist spy. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Lil Peep
[edit]Hi Hell Hawk,
I reverted your edit [1] on Lil Peep, but pressed save before I could explain the edit summary.
The Swedish part of the subject's ethnicity/nationality had a reference attached to it. Which suggests that it is legitimate. So if you disagree, it'd be better to discuss it on the talk page first, or at least explain your reasoning on the talk page.
Cheers, seb26 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Look at the history. Oh what's that? You were WRONG? Hell Hawk (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Hell Hawk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)