User talk:Hefha72
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Way2veers (talk) 00:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Hefha72, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Hefha72! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OGBranniff for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Mkdwtalk 21:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SPONGE (Activist Group)
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as SPONGE (Activist Group), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RNealK (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of SPONGE (Activist Group) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SPONGE (Activist Group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPONGE (Activist Group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RNealK (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)