User talk:Healthdefender

Welcome!

Hello, Healthdefender, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Health Federation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Health Federation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1982, the magazine is a continuation of earlier journals of the Federation, with different names (e.g., ''Public Scrutiny,'' dating back to the 1950s. Various topics and subjects are covered in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Health Federation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1982, the magazine is a continuation of earlier journals of the Federation, with different names (e.g., ''Public Scrutiny,'' dating back to the 1950s. Various topics and subjects are covered in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Health Federation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1982, the magazine is a continuation of earlier journals of the Federation, with different names (e.g., ''Public Scrutiny,'' dating back to the 1950s. Various topics and subjects are covered in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to National Health Federation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MastCell ^Talk 20:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Your recent editing history at National Health Federation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

You appear to be removing large amounts of well-sourced, relevant information from the article. Could you please explain your rationale on the article talkpage (Talk:National Health Federation)? MastCell ^Talk 22:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]