User talk:HealthAdvisorCA
Content
October 2009
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)HealthAdvisorCA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wasn't paying attention to edits I was making. I violated Wikipedia guidelines unintentionally. Please reconsider my ban.
Decline reason:
As you violated guidelines in the same way on all of your accounts it cannot have been accidental. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 16:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note: Sockpuppet of several other accounts. Contact me before unblocking. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 01:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sockpuppetry is proven beyond doubt. Relevance to block reason is that socks have been used to post the same spam.--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 16:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)