User talk:Heah/archive5

Updated Dec 20 2006; HELP! The Bambu guy is back and vandalising the pages again :(

He's getting a bit more active again and using the IP 24.215.229.224

You've blocked him before but he's back at his old Tricks :(

Could you please block him again :(

--Mrtobacco 21:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Amanita muscaria, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

NPA

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Milo H Minderbinder 19:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply at Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows#7/7/7 release --he ah 01:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe7

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Zoe7, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Matt 08:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter 7

[1]...[2] Thanks for playing, hope you learned something along the way. --Milo H Minderbinder 14:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Youth Leadership Camp

(Query sent also to Centrx)

As two previous Youth Leadership Camp articles contributed by other editors have been deleted as copyvios, and one of them was deleted by you, I want to bring it to your attention that I am working on a non-copyvio stub about the camp.

In the hope of discouraging future additions of copyvio material, I intend to include a brief summary of the fates of the earlier articles on the stub's talk page. Do you know of any objections to this? (I've watchlisted your talk page and will look for a reply here.) — Athænara ✉ 02:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments/discussion

Hiya Heah :) I know you're busy, but if you have a spare moment or two, would you mind dropping by Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants for a moment to put in your two cents regarding a dispute over our use of the term "psychedelic drug". Thanks :) --Thoric 06:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Langhorne slim.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Langhorne slim.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(replaced with image:Langhorne_Slim,_Brooklyn.jpg ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Psychedelic mushroom split proposal

I've made a proposal to substantially reorganize Psychedelic mushroom, Psilocybe, and Amanita muscaria. The discussion is at Talk:Psychedelic_mushroom#Split_proposal if you're interested.

Cheers – Peter G Werner 20:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Matrixism: an Entheogenic Religion

There is an article on a entheogenic new religious movement called Matrixism being created at User:Xoloz/Matrixism. There are numerous sources for this article yet it has because contentious because it deals with the subject of entheogens. Thought you might like to look at it and perhaps contribute. 206.124.144.3 05:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cosmic serpent.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cosmic serpent.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Socrates

The Socrates article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 19:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blacksand.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Blacksand.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --βandβ ^{(talk•contribs)} 10:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Keerllston has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I think you're really cool. I saw your /work subpage, you might want to update it at some point, radical empiricism is now a page and so on...
Oh and I think reliable and scientific do have something to do with each other - which does mean that scientific articles are less likely to be deleted and that scientific topics are more likely to be acceptable. Sociology, logic, linguistics, are sciences though.--Keerllston 17:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Lame Deer.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Lame Deer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]