User talk:Heah/archive2

Trichocereus peruvianus

Hi, just wanted to let u know that i listed your redirect for deletion. TeunSpaans 28 June 2005 18:54 (UTC)

help

I think I need to talk to an administrator. While I was on vacation, i got an email saying that someone with the IP of 199.224.119.89 had requested my password, so a new password was emailed to me. I did not request a new password. I think someone is trying to hijack my account. can you help me. please reply on my talk page thank you

--Henrybaker 01:11, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Saw you working on Ken Kesey and Furthur and thought I'd give you a shout. I'm modestly interested in your new wikiproject although I fear it'd be too technical for me. I'd be more interested in something like a, say, Wikipedia:Wikiproject Counterculture. Anyway, keep up the good stuff. · Katefan0^(scribble) 03:22, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Re: put back "food of the gods" link. why is this link "questionable"?

That book is still in print so this seemed relevant, but I don't mind.

metacine

(Response to your post on my talk page)

Hey Heah! Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. You may want to check out Daniel Pinchbeck's forums for a taste of some of what is going into Metacine. And of course, the info at the Metacine.net site might be generally informative. Daniel is currently at Burning Man and they're doing some filming for a Metacine DVD project. The web project is still not quite ready for a wiki yet, despite my enthusiasm for the idea, so stay tuned for more info! — FJ | hello 01:41, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

Mescaline

Once again, thanks a bunch for your well-sourced contributions. We meet again on the entheogens. :)--chris.lawson 22:02, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Drug dab

Hi! Thanks for commenting on my talk page. Well, that bot just brings them up on the screen--unfortunately, it was my poor judgement on the link to choose. I see that you corrected the three that you left on my talk page. Most of them dabs that I worked on were specifc to hard drug, soft drug or recreational drug use. After getting into more technical articles, I found that my skills didn't help ;-), and stopped working on them. Any further thoughts or comments you may have are apprecited. >: Roby Wayne ^Talk 04:48, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your broken signature

See Help:Preferences#Your_nickname for how to fix it. Uncle G 14:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: signature problems...

Hi. Maybe Uncle G's suggestion helped you with your signature. I don't even know how to automate mine, I just type -~~~<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> ~~~~~ every time. I think there must be a shortcut, but I've never felt all that compelled to work it out. -GTBacchus^(talk) 08:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LSD

See my comments on Talk:LSD. --Viriditas 01:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good thing. I've already removed one entry that I couldn't verify. I'm working on the others. --Viriditas 02:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me about what is going on in Alkyl nitrites, you think that issue will get resolved accordingly? I'm sure it will - considering the MENSA-eligible minds here have greater power.

Thanks again.--Ddhix 2002 09:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Allabout2006

RE: Allabout2006

"and while im' not sure why this message never got to me, i reported you for vandalism just as i said would as you refuse to stop putting a commercial link on the article, one that has been removed almost a dozen times. you were told not to do that by various people and you still did it another half dozen times. --Heah (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2005 (UTC)"

I didn't know who he was referring to, or I would have copied you earlier. I did sockpuppet him though. xaosflux ^T/_C 03:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Per Jensen

Don't know him, use google and use AFD if needed...? Good luck. feydey 02:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ayahuasca/maois

Hi Heah, nice to hear from you! I removed it from the MAOI category because Harmala (the MAOI part of Ayahuasca) was already listed in the MAOI category. I figured that we didn't need to re-iterate it with the combination Ayahuasca. Also, I figured that the main effect of Ayahuasca is for hallucinogenic/entheogenic use, as opposed to the MAOI effects. Uthbrian 22:01, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool... I definitely agree with your edit-- replace "ayahuasca" with harmaline on the MAOI template. I guess I feel more comfortable having specific chemical names & plant species. I went ahead and removed ayahuasca from the MAOI cat. It's quite interesting to discuss this specific entheogen. I first heard about this mixture in grad school when I was reading about melatonin, then DMT... long story :-) Uthbrian 23:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism. It's good to see the people are helping me on a day that I'm too ill to do it myself... --05:47, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Herbal & fungal categories

Hi Heah; I've been going through the articles listed in Herbal & fungal drugs/medicines, Herbal & fungal stimulants and Herbal & fungal hallucinogens, and many of the articles don't belong. The category titles imply that the articles contained are accepted medications, none of which are. On that note, medicinal plants is a more appropriate category for the articles, because the plants have medicinal effects. Also, & should not be in the titles, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories). I'm going to nominate these categories for CfD shortly; I'm just giving you a heads up. --CDN99 19:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Well, nobody is voting at CfD for the category....so, what about a new name: Medicinal herbs and fungi? "Drugs" should be taken from the title; this isn't a cultural bias, a person with tuberculosis in Angola would know that isoniazid is a drug, but that thorn scrub tea is not (although it might have medicinal effects). Since it's your project, and you probably know more about it than me, I'll leave it to you and your project members. Merry Christmas! --CDN99 18:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:000 0142.JPG

Hi, this image was lacking any kind of copyright tagging. Seeing as it's aparently a picture of your late pet-rat so I tagged it as GFDL presumed, if this is correct please change the tag to {{GFDL-self}} or apply another suitable copyright tag. Please also check any other images you have uploaded and make sure that they have both a proper source and copyright tagging on them. Other images might not be so easy to identify, and images with unknown source or copyright statis are speedy deletion candidates after beeing "flagged" for at least 7 days. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 04:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test

Do you know what might have happened here? Did you see an edit conflict warning? [1] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

herbal/fungal

Do you mean should things like cannabis or opium be included under the new name Medicinal...? I'd consider psychoactives to be "medicinal," even if they aren't used for a medicinal purpose. --CDN99 22:06, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to help out... I didn't know you could make the changes automatically! How is that done? Sometimes I need to switch redirects and have to do dozens by hand. Badagnani 21:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote for drug chart

Hi Heah :) Happy Holidays and Happy New Year :) I was wondering if you might be up to voting for my psychoactive drug chart on Wikipedia featured picture candidates? --Thoric 18:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: FP nom, of course i'll support, i love that chart- thanks for the heads-up. not quite sure why everyone seems to think that it's original research. --Heah talk 00:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Awesome! Thanks :) Just need a couple more votes and it may end up as a featured pic, which would be very cool :) --Thoric 00:24, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NekoDaemon bot request

hi, category:Herbal & fungal drugs/medicines went through the speedy renaming process some days ago and should now be category:Medicinal herbs and fungi; two subcats should be changed accordingly too, category:Herbal & fungal hallucinogens and Category:Herbal & fungal stimulants. i put up the redirect templates last night, expecting it all to change, but now i see that an admin needs to have made the last edit and i'm not an admin. so is there some way you can make your bot change it anyways, considering its a valid, WP:CFD approved changed? I'd rather not have to go through hundreds of articles to make the change manually. thanks a lot. --Heah ^talk 17:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another user has already made the requested changes, as all the categories you've given me is empty. --AllyUnion (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

British usage the standard on Wikipedia?

I just want some clarification if this is consensus policy. I was under the impression that only consistency within the article was important. The article Socrates is written and was originally written in American English. There are other examples of non-British English in the article. Someone changed this one sentence to reflect British rather than American English, creating inconsistency. This is only acceptable if British English is consensus policy. I cannot revert it myself to make it consistent due to the three revert rule. Please either change it back, or affirm that it is correct consensus Wikipedia policy to Anglicize articles and then review the rest of the article to make it internally consistent. The American words I caught were Anglicize (ironically enough), idealize, and stabilize, but I am by no means an expert and there may be more. Argyrios 07:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also "learned." I am sure that there are also subtle grammatical issues. I look forward to your overhaul or revert. Argyrios 07:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info... I learned something too. If "an" is acceptable before "historical" in formal writing, I see no need to change it so long as it isn't inconsistent. Happy editing to you as well! Argyrios 09:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

In case you didn't Watch my Talk page, I've replied to your message there. Feel free to delete this trivial addition to your own talk page. --kingboyk 00:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/KM

You commented on Kelly Martin's second RfC. it is up for archival. you may vote at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Kelly_Martin#Archiving_this_RfC. CastAStone|^(talk) 03:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 2012 Apocalyptic theories

Hoo dilly, goin' back a month on that one. Looking at it again, I still believe that there is no meaningful content - while there is similar material between the deleted content and 2012 section on Theories of apocalypticism and/or spiritual transformation, it is minimal and the latter is decidedly more substantive while the former is mostly gibberish and copyvio of a religious website. You are probably better off just forking 2012 section on Theories of apocalypticism and/or spiritual transformation into a new 2012 Apocalyptic theories or writing a new version as it would be better than what I speedied. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Deunov

Hi Heah; I wonder if you would mind looking over my shoulder at the Peter Deunov article? I feel like it may be beyond what I can deal with. Your comments would be welcome. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help. I appreciate your comment. Sometimes I feel like I've slipped into a X-Files episode. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, your turn

I added Socratic dialogues to Template:Platonism and filled in Socratic dialogues with something appropriate as a starter kit, if you will. The actual content of Socratic method is all about the method, by whatever name, and not the litererature as a whole - the books - which is what Socratic dialogues can discuss. The literature as individual books is of course covered in each of their own articles. So, your turn. I'm going to go to sleep now. Cheers. WAS 4.250 05:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Psychonaut

Can you explain what is going on with psychonaut? I am really confused. Kit O'Connell (Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 05:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prometheuspan 03:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Yeah, I tried to have a discussion with Thoric over it before I did it, but he kept having obvious Shtopple issues. I knew i was a bit early in my Wikipedia education to try to do that, but i figured that somebody else might come along and fix it up.[reply]

Thanks for being so kewl about it and all, you did a great job, I knew that there was a happy middle somewhere... I just didn't have the happy middle to pull out of my hat. Prometheuspan 03:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cannabis cats

Hi. Yes, there is overlap between the two cats, but I think we can fix this. Basically, I've been going through Category:Activism for the past month or so trying to cleanup and sort activists by topic. If you think the cannabis activists category should be a subcat of legal reform, I don't have a problem with that; I would prefer to keep activists in activist cats and legal reform topics in legal reform, but if you have a better solution that preserves the activists by topic subcat, go with it. —Viriditas | Talk 07:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

psychonaut

Prometheuspan 01:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC) i have added comments to my talk page, and vanished the huge big loud noise on the psychonaut discussion page. (i hope that was an appropriate estimation of right action.) Prometheuspan 01:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, i have 5 minutes remaining until i have to leave. (the computer lab.)

You have obviously gone and done exactly what i was asking for, and once again, i really appreciate you for it, and i will have to get to it tomorrow.

Thanks...Thanks...Thanks...Thanks...!!!

)

Prometheuspan 04:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have done so much good work on the article, It is easier to just copy it now, and paste it over to my talk area, to discuss. Thanks again.

)

Prometheuspan 23:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cluster Headaches & Psilocybin

Hi, Heah. I cited some sources on this and you responded, but you didn't revert this edit. Do you intend to? Erasurehead 16:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Victory of UDV!

I just read about the sweet victory of gonz vs. UDV! Yippeee! Are you writing about this? Erasurehead

Re: Symposium sp

You're welcome. Keep up the article writing! :)

Cheers, Cmdrjameson 00:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alkyl nitrites

Heah, I did not (un)semi-protect this article, it had been unprotected for 3 days. The article was categorized in to semi protected articles by User:DenisDiderot, although they are not an administrator, I removed the incorrect tag. Edits by User:68.251.158.126 are in violation of 3RR, and they have been blocked. User:69.39.135.109 appears to be a sockpuppet/alternate ip of the first anon, and has been blocked as well. Should this article start getting in to an edit war you can request page protection at WP:RFP. Please talk page me if you have any other questions. Thanks, xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 04:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Just saying hi.

Gonzales v. UDV

I wanted to thank you for your nice comments and let you know I responded on the article's talk page. I agree with you in that the UDV will likely agree, but my or your opinon doesn't really matter as Wikipedia needs to be based on statements that are able to be cited. I am going to be adding a lot more information to this page as this case will likely be a significant Free Exercise case, like Employment Division v. Smith. Look forward to editing with you. Assawyer 04:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cannabis legal reform

I think this category would be more inclusive if we changed the name to "Cannabis legal issues". What do you think? —Viriditas | Talk 07:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Pro-cannabis userbox

This user is pro-cannabis.

If you would like to have this on your userpage, just add {{User:Disavian/Userboxes/pro-cannabis}} to your userpage, and the box at right will appear on it. Also, if used in your user space, the page will be listed on Category:Pro-cannabis Wikipedians. If you would like to share it with someone else, type {{User:Disavian/Userboxes/pro-cannabis|stamp|right}}

Also, consider weighing in on the Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll.

Stand up and be counted while you still can,

StrangerInParadise 20:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my recent RFA. It passed 53/1/2 and I am now an administrator. I appreciate that some of you made exceptions to your usual requirements re length of service and so on because we've interracted positively in the past, or because of my credentials, so I will endeavour to use my new mop cautiously. I'm always open to feedback and gently constructive criticism. If you're not an admin and need some assistance do of course please let me know. Thanks again --kingboyk 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

The Shamen

Hello again, Visiting as I was to offer my RFA thanks, the threads on your talk page reminded me: I recently added a Terence McKenna quote to The Shamen article. He describes very nicely the terrible that conundrum that is commercial success for a 'respectably underground band'. There's a link to the full interview; if you haven't seen it before you might enjoy it. --kingboyk 01:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Barnstar For You!

		The Original Barnstar
		For outstanding contribution to Wikipedia's knowledge of Psychedelics, dissociatives and deliriants both through the creation of WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants and your extremely numerous articles and edits. Countless psychonauts are in your debt! Kit O'Connell (Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 05:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Assessment

I was just reading about this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_assessment

I was wondering if you wanted to nominate Psychedelics as a topic for article assessment, then nominate some individual articles for assessment within that topic. It might be a good way of assessing the strengths and weaknesses of articles in this category, and maybe bring in a few more potential contributors. Peter G Werner 07:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Psychedelic experience

Yes, I noticed the tags today... I know the page needs work, so will have to see what the guy thinks should be changed. I don't see how anyone who hasn't had a psychedelic experience can say much about it... basically Wikipedians have to read published articles on the topic, and summarize the information. --Thoric 19:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's the best image copyright tag for the evidence?

I became the victim of article deletion due to lack of evidence (verifibility). My article was about the upcoming Mr. Mystery but got tagged and deleted. I decided to ask you this question because, looking at your user page, you also had articles that were written and deleted (In fact, on the article that you wrote about Timewave Zero, it redirected into Novelity Theory.). We all know that deleted articles and edits made by us count as deleted edits in Kate's Tool and the article deletion gave me my first deleted edit.

On to the question: I have the evidence that it's coming up but the evidence is printed into the book and the credits near the beginning of the book says that:

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from Flame Of The Forest Publishing Pte Ltd.

Since that damned evidence is printed into the book, I'm reluctant to upload it due to the copyright. Thus, I can't save my Mr. Mystery article from deletion. I really feel forced to upload the evidence (Plus the cover for Mr. Midnight #1). Can you please tell me the appropriate image copyright tag for those pictures I'm proposing to upload? Pls. reply on my talk page. Thank you. --Bruin rrss23 09:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S Pls. archive your talk page; it's getting quite difficult to add new messages here.