User talk:Headtale

Thanks for fixing the vandalism to Indian Head, Saskatchewan; I've added a warning to the talk page of the user responsible. If they continue vandalising after this warning you can use one of the more severe warnings such as {{test3}} or {{blatantvandal}}. If they still continue vandalising after these warnings, report them at WP:AIV and they'll be blocked. Demiurge 20:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Telemiracle

Hi. I have responded at Talk:Telemiracle. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Baker (musician)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sam Baker (musician), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sambakermusic.com/info.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Ryanmeili.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryanmeili.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions above explain the way it must be done. Thanks, — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 17:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be too long, they are pretty quick dealing with tickets. :) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ryan Meili has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bflickr\.com/(?:photos|groups|search)\b (links: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=%22ryan+meili%22&w=all&m=&s=&mt=&referer_searched=&sourceid=mozilla-search). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on Dwain Lingenfelter. It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 00:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Headtale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was just about to initiate a discussion with Szegus on his talk page to resolve our different views about relevance of materials relating to an ongoing political campaign in Canada. But when I hit "post", I got the Blocked message. If unblocked, I would go and begin that process.

Decline reason:

That is what you do to avoid being blocked in the first place. Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for and you will not repeat that behavior or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Toddst1 (talk) 06:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, I'll wait until I'm back but can you please investigate the newly created user: Sidthekid72 - he just set up an account yesterday and his only edit was reverting my last changes on the Dwain Lingenfelter page - leading me to suspect that it may be Szegus posting from a different location. (Plus his reason is that vote buying is not illegal in party rules yet he removed something about a vote buying scandal for the candidate he's supporting.) Thanks! Headtale (talk) 13:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Compromise for Szegus

Just for the record, here's what I was going to post on Szegus' talk page before the Block was initiated:

We should probably figure out a compromise on what is relevant and what isn't in regards to Lingenfelter/Meili and by extension, their endorsers. I don't feel that your bringing up the allegations about Maynard's possible vote buying is completely irrelevant given what's happening again with Lingenfelter. But in some of the places you're inserting it and how you're wording it, you're creating false equivalencies that are 'not' neutral point of view. (This is the guiding principle of Wikipedia and I know you only set-up your account a few days ago so you may not realise that.)

Your wording and connecting Sontag to Meili in this way makes it seem as if you're saying "it's happened before so this is no different." My point is that this is very different - Lingenfelter, the candidate who is running, has admitted his guilt and that his campaign paid for the 1100 memberships with small bills whereas Ryan has been endorsed by a former leadership candidate who was accused of this activity (did he admit wrong-doing? Was a lawyer called to investigate? As far as I know, no but I stand to be corrected.)

The other thing is that Link has a MUCH longer history than Meili and if we start putting in all the negatives about each candidate, there's no way that Link comes out ahead. So my proposal is this - I'm happy to leave in the references to the Sontag allegations in Lingenfelter's entry since vote-buying is something that's been alleged before - both for Sontag and for Lingenfelter. But I don't see how relating it to Meili is relevant or should be part of Ryan's entry.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Ryan Meili do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/electryanmeili, http://www.youtube.com/electryanmeili (redirect from http://www.youtube.com/electryanmeili)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Ryan Meili do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://accidentaldeliberations.blogspot.com/2009/05/leadership-2009-endorsement.html, http://western-canada.blogspot.com/2009/05/sask-ndp-leadership-race-blog.html, http://buckdogpolitics.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noah evanchuk

I have deleted this article as unduly promotional. You should leave this one to people that don't have any connection to the subject. That or something else is impeding your ability to write neutrally about this particular person.--Chaser (talk) 04:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ryan Meili - Candidate for the 2013 Leadership of the Saskatchewan NDP.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ryan Meili - Candidate for the 2013 Leadership of the Saskatchewan NDP.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Meili2013headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Meili2013headshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a note to this page (http://www.ryanmei.li/official_logos_images) making the CC license explicit. Let me know if you need anything else. Headtale (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Just thought I would ask if you work for or otherwise represent Ryan Meili's leadership campaign. If so, that would put you in a conflict of interest position, and it's better to disclose that openly so that other editors can give you the benefit of good faith. There are some problems that I've tagged on the page which I plan on addressing shortly. Cheers. --Drm310 (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm a volunteer on his campaign. Where/how do I disclose this?

Headtale (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you haven't already, you should check the pages for the other three leadership candidates as I'm sure they are all in a similar situation with campaign volunteers contributing to and then monitoring the pages of their preferred candidates. Cheers!

Headtale (talk) 05:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should make a formal declaration on the article talk page. You could also create your user page and state it there.

I have already started combing through the other candidate's pages. I did quite a bit of editing on Trent Wotherspoon's article yesterday and I will continue my work on it soon. I'll do the same for Cam Broten and Erin Weir too. Hopefully if there are volunteers editing those pages, they will be as equally honest about their COI. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the pointers. I don't use Wikipedia enough to be super-familiar with the ins and outs of how these things are done so I appreciate your guidance.

Headtale (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?

Greetings again, Headtale. I see that you have created an article for Nicole White, an NDP candidate for the 2016 Saskatchewan election. I'd just like to remind you that if you are volunteering for the party again, you should disclose this. If you are being paid for your work, then such a disclosure is mandatory per WP:PAID.

Please also limit the information you add to that which can be verified by reliable, third-party sources. User-generated content from social media (e.g. blogs, Twitter, Facebook) is not considered reliable and should be avoided. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there,

Just seeing this message now as I rarely add/contribute to Wikipedia anymore (partly because I find many of the rules overbearing, inconsistently applied and hard to follow.) That's my issue, not yours but anyhow, I was not paid to create the page for Nicole White but thanks for checking. And never minding my own issues with the site (cite - ha!), kudos to you for the work you do. The concept of Wikipedia is such a powerful force but unfortunately in my view, undermined by the execution in many cases. This isn't the place for it but if you ever want to discuss further, I'm pretty easy to track down on Facebook, e-mail, etc. under my user name. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Headtale (talk • contribs)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Headtale. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ryanmeili2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ryanmeili2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shouting in the Void

Around this time of year, I always get requests from Wikipedia asking me to once again be a financial supporter of this site as I have been in the past. The emails I receive have a link to donate, a link to unsubscribe but there's never a clear way to reply and explain why I choose not to donate again.

As someone who spent hours looking through encyclopedias in my grandma's home growing up, as someone who loves the potential of the Internet, as someone who wrote more than one paper with Wikipedia as the subject while completing my Master of Library Science degree, I should be someone who is a regular contributor to this site - both in terms of content and also financially.

But I can't do it.

Everytime I re-read my Talk page and see how many of my attempts to add to this site have been reversed or deleted completely, I feel an incredible sense of frustration.

I didn't jump through the complicated hoops to have a photo I added to the site remain on the site. My attempt to start a page about an upcoming musician who would go on to have his music cited on Rolling Stone "Best of the Year" lists is deleted because I started the article with...content from the musician's page (true, copyrighted material but I suspect the musician would be okay with that!) and isn't the point to rebuild, rework and grow articles from those kinds of starting points? I've watched others who've repeatedly reverted my changes continue to do so under a fake account without penalty.

I know I'm shouting in the void here and Wikipedia probably won't listen. That's part of the problem too. How many others like me who *want* to help this site grow and improve are simply turned off by the fact that you have to practically have a degree in Wikipedia to use Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Headtale (talk • contribs)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lukas Rossi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lukas Rossi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukas Rossi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Indian Head, Saskatchewan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Indian Head, Saskatchewan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]