User talk:Headshox1982

Speedy deletion of Ellis briggs

A tag has been placed on Ellis briggs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ChaoticReality 20:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ellis briggs, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ellis briggs

I declined speedy deletion of the article as it didn't seem too adverty to me. You should probably try to beef up the article in terms of notability though. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]