User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2013/August

Why did you undo the changes?

To use the word "quantum" is much more accurate. To use the word "physical" is inappropriate and vague at best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.77.90.3 (talk) 23:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

AAB

Hey. The bot crashed round 28th, so when I noticed I ran it for a few days up to today. I take it you've reset it now on your side since it also ran today from your end? It bugged with the duplicate archives as usual when we switched PCs... —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 18:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually I just got home today. No idea what happened, computer was running, but FF had crashed. Should I run it tomorrow? Or is there something else? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Template:Permanently protected or else

Hi Headbomb,

I userfied this template to User:Dimension10/Permanently protected or else, and deleted the cross-space redirect, so the helpful TFD bot promptly closed your TFD nomination. If you just thought that it shouldn't be in template space, problem solved. If you think the new page shouldn't exist either, then I think you'll have to open a new MFD. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quark

I don't know why you undid 'nucleus' to 'atom' again, if you read carefully the original paper (Reference 43)it clearly stated 'gold nucleus' twice, not atom.

The original paper is easily accessible on web. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uscbino (talk • contribs) 15:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Again, the atom mass is pretty much the same as a the nucleus mass, and is a more accessible comparison point for layreaders. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

For the major reference cleanup at List of microorganisms tested in outer space, my hat off. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 22:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

@BatteryIncluded: No problems. In general, you can just use {{cite journal|doi=10.xxxx/....}} or similar ({{cite journal|pmid=...}}), and ask User:Citation bot to take care of things for you. It's not perfect (hence why I insert "pre arranged" empty citation templates with all the parameters I think it could use), but it's a very nifty bot. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the tools!. I thought I had to be a computer wiz to do that. I will look into it. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 12:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

An invitation

I wish to invite you to this discussion (on Randykitty's talk page) and maybe you can give your point of view or assessment. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 04:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)