User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2012/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Headbomb. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WTF?
You nominate someone's creations for deletion while they are blocked, and don't even have the decency to leave a message? Shame on you Mr Headbomb. Rich Farmbrough, 23:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC).
- You're blocked/banned from editing anything except your ARBCOM cases and own talk page. There's no point in notifying you. Especially when it doesn't stop you from commenting. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Seriously? Poor show all round. Very poor. Rich Farmbrough, 01:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC).
- Seriously? Poor show all round. Very poor. Rich Farmbrough, 01:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC).
Inflation (cosmology) for bibcode bot
Please run the bot on Inflation (cosmology) as I've just done a round of citation expansion on it. Thanks Rjwilmsi
OL template
Since are the last person to edit it, I thought I would point out that it is broken. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:OL/testcases Note that citation (and cite) templates only work for authors.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pages_with_OL_errors
AManWithNoPlan (talk) 22:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm... nope, it works for all valid entries AFAIK. Endings with H aren't valid. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- However, {{citation/identifier}} had broken behaviour. This should be fixed soon. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:51, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into that. I couldn't figure out where the problem was AManWithNoPlan (talk) 00:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
|
A Barnstar Point | |
| Thanks for correcting the syntax on Book:Sex Pistols. :-) benzband (talk) 15:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC) |
Your comments at Rich's Arbcom case
Your comments at Rich's arbcom case about me where wildly innapropriate and flat out false. If you bothered to read the reason why I lost access you would see that it had absolutely nothing to do with my speed of editing. If you have a problem with me andn my edits thats fine tell me or keep them to yourself but don't go adding tangents to an already heated debate. Considering everyone thinks I am the untrustworthy one you have shown extremely poor judgement adding lies. Kumioko (talk) 20:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- And I think your malicious socking designed to dupe me into wasting several hours of my time in helping a "newbie" learn the ropes should get you permabanned from the project. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- For what its worth I used to think extremely highly about the project and its future but even since people are too worried about me and WPUS taking over their project than about helping the pedia and the articles, wuite frankly, my strong and loving feelings towards the project aren't what they used to be. Probably because I see so many people doing wrong by each other that it makes the place not pleasant anymore. You might have noticed my editing decreased and is now sporadic. For what its worth I appreciated the help and it wasn't wasted. Kumioko (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Bull-fucking-shit. Your only intentions were to create a time sink out of petty revenge, despite my repeated attempt to protect you from your own dumb self. Now go away. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thats fine I'll leave I just wanted to tell you your comments were inappropriate anyway not get trolled into a long and heated discussion. I guess conduct for admins and botops is bit different than regular contributors cause if a non admin talked like that they would probably be blocked. Interesting though how frustration and irritation can cause us to act different than our normal selves. Kumioko (talk) 00:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Bull-fucking-shit. Your only intentions were to create a time sink out of petty revenge, despite my repeated attempt to protect you from your own dumb self. Now go away. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- For what its worth I used to think extremely highly about the project and its future but even since people are too worried about me and WPUS taking over their project than about helping the pedia and the articles, wuite frankly, my strong and loving feelings towards the project aren't what they used to be. Probably because I see so many people doing wrong by each other that it makes the place not pleasant anymore. You might have noticed my editing decreased and is now sporadic. For what its worth I appreciated the help and it wasn't wasted. Kumioko (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Template:Awards Won by Lost has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
{{JPL small body}}
Nice improvement of the template, but it can't be used anymore inside references: accessdate param is gone and the layout probably doesn't look right (there are some instances where it is transcluded this way, although I can't find any at the moment). GregorB (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- For references, you want {{cite sbdb}}. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Haven't seen it. Good point. GregorB (talk) 07:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager 22:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Identifiers/templates for Biodiversity Heritage Library, BioStor
What do you think about having citation parameters and/or standalone templates for the Biodiversity Heritage Library and BioStor? Rjwilmsi 12:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Non Print a section
Is there a way to tag a section of an articel so that it will not print in a book? In all of the unit histories in the book Book:Arkansas Confederate Infantry Units there is an External Links heading. This heading takes up from 1/5th to 1/3rd of a page but is not useful in the printed book and I woundered if there were a way to Tag it so that it would not print with the book. It would probably save me about 12 pages on the book. Thanks. Aleutian06 (talk) 03:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Template:Interstate 670 (Kansas–Missouri) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Imzadi 1979 → 18:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I have tried to copy edit the article and I am not sure whether its fully copy edited. I believe you can help in this regard and the article is also growing with contents so reconsidering its quality scale is also needed I believe. Shriram (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Help needed
Hello! Can you please somehow help me with this? Thanks in advance! --WhiteWriterspeaks 22:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)