User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2012/January
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Headbomb. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Schrödinger equation re-write (by me)
Hello - according to the wikiproject physics member list we could contact you for reviewing articles... So - when you have time, could you please see here, here and the main article? Thanks in advance. Basically I re-wrote the article to try and make it more systematic and rigourous, and tweaked some sentences here and there in attempt to make the context simpler, but already there is a complaint on how complex and useless my contributions are (i'm sure)... =( Happy new year anyway! =) -- F = q(E + v × B) 17:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Request for Interview Regarding Wikipedia Bots
Greetings-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a graduate student at the University of Oregon, currently collecting data for my dissertation on Wikipedia editors who create and use bots and assisted editing tools, as well as editors involved in the initial and/or ongoing creation of bot policies on Wikipedia. As a member of BAG and an active member of the bot community, I would very much like to interview you for the project at a time and in a method that is most convenient for you (Gchat, another IM client, Skype, email, telephone, etc.). I am completely flexible and can work with your schedule. The interview will take approximately 30-45 minutes.
My dissertation project has been approved both by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Oregon, and by the Research Committee at the Wikimedia Foundation. You can find more information on the project on my meta page.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you to set up a time to chat. Thank you very much.
Randall Livingstone, School of Journalism & Communication, University of Oregon
UOJComm (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Paul John Ellis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul John Ellis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul John Ellis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 02:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)