User talk:HeadSnap
Fallowfield image
[edit]My fault. I ought to have left you a note explaining the deletion tag. I'm not really trying to delete the image, I'm simply trying to delete the local version (as it is now a duplicate of the Commons version). This sort of image should really be over the Commons, where it can also be used on other Wikimedia projects and can be properly catagorized with other public domain images. Therefore, I uploaded it to the Commons a week or so ago. Typically, when an exact duplicate has been uploaded to the Commons (with the same image name), the local version is tagged with a {{NowCommons}} (aka "ncd") tag and the local version will be deleted by a bot at some point. This type deletion does not interfere with any of the articles using the image, nor does it require any editing of those articles, because the local image will immediately be replaced with the identical Commons image. This is exactly what happened with the other image in the Fallowfield, Ottawa article (Image:SteepleHill Churches ca1910.jpg).
The problem with Image:Fallowfield Road Gang 1880.jpg is that it contained archival references in the image itself. Typically, this sort of information is cropped out of the image and moved to the image description page, which is what another editor did when it was uploaded to the Commons. Unfortunately, the timing of the crop presented a problem, because the local Wikipedia image had yet to be deleted, and suddenly the local and Commons versions were no longer identical. The bot that reviews duplicate local images recognized the fact that the local version and the Commons versions were not bit-by-bit copies, and rejected the deletion. And, therefore, the Commons version (which is cropped and has licensing details in accordance with Wikimedia requirements) won't "take over" from the local version, unless the local one is manually deleted. Therefore, the deletion tag.
I hope that makes sense. The image itself will continue to exist on Wikipedia -- there will just no longer be duplicate versions. Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:S-awards
[edit]Template:S-awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 11:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
New 10,000 Challenge for Canada
[edit]Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)