User talk:He Who Is

Techniques for differentiation

I did some formatting at that article, which will give you a tip or two about the style used here. In particular, one does not start a sentence with "Where", and there should be a period at the end of the formula when formula is at the end of sentence. Small things, but good to know. :) You can reply here if you have comments. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English varieties

Advice: English dialects on Wikipedia: Wikipedia has millions of readers; some use American English, or British English, or International English, or any of numerous other local forms from Australia, Canada, Ireland etc. Because of this, Wikipedia has a policy of respecting articles written in whatever form of English the original author of the article used.

The guidelines are simple. For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Enjoy your time on the internet's fastest growing encyclopædia/encyclopedia . Thank you. --cj | talk 08:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logarithm

I undid your changes to logarithm. I understand what you were trying to say, however, it is implicitely assumed in that article that the base is constant while the power is variable. I agree that that sentence was a big ambiguous, but I think your interpretting exponentiation as a function of two variables, one the base and one the power, does not make things clearer, rather more complicated (why can't the power and the base be both variable?). I now clarified there that the base is constant. You can reply here if you have comments. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying. The article is about the inverse to an exponential function, as opposed to an inverse of the third binary operation. Root extraction doe not invert an exponential function. Thank you. He Who Is 16:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I...

haha benzen ring? And I feel like "6-(3,4-ksilil)-1-hegzen" (patented by me)

File:ForHWI.GIF--Kedi 11:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

0<k<1 ;

$1+k+k^{2}+k^{3}+k^{4}+.....=a$ ,

than what is the value of $(1+2k+3k^{2}+4k^{3}+5k^{4}+.....)$ ?

Answer is $a^{2}$ but I couldnat get how...

All I got is $1/(1-k)=a$ ; than?

Thanx

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polar graph

You placed a speedy deletion tag on Polar graph claiming that the page was now obsolete. Note that just becuase nothing links to it, people can still type it into a search, which is why it still exists as a redirect. —Mets501 (talk) 02:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. You're right. Sorry. I should've considered that. Thanks for removing it. -- He Who Is^{[ Talk ]} 03:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchy Userbox

I saw your Anarchy Userbox on the Userbox/Beliefs page. If I might make an aesthetic suggestion, the blue lettering of "anarchist movement", when viewed against the black background, is very hard to read. It would look better if you used red lettering, though I'm not sure if color of links can be controlled from the template itself. Otherwise, consider a different background – perhaps red background and mostly black lettering for the right part of the box, and black background with a red @ on the left. Just a suggestion. Peter G Werner 04:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. When I made I did notice that it could certainly use some wor, and intended change the colors. But It slipped my mind for a moment. -- He Who Is^{[ Talk ]} 13:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World's Smallest Political Quiz userbox

You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.

Please reply to User talk:Audacity, as I will not be watching your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 07:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyper operators

I developed a general framework for extending hyper-operators to reals (not complex). See the Talk:Hyper_operator page. I thought you might be interested, due to your similar comments elsewhere. AJRobbins (talk) 20:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]