User talk:Hdawsond

Hi setting up some Forgotten Australian content on wikipedia in need of some assistance in placing content and editing properly any help in this regard much appreciated Thanks Helen Hdawsond (talk) 05:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Elizium23. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to George Pell seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC) Elizium I don't know how to contact you directly.[reply]

I have been attending the Royal Commission in Australia and been listening to George Pell's testimony last week and up to yesterday. There have been serious crimes committed of sexual assault against children that have been systemically covered up by George Pell and Denis Hart. I intend to put all the links to books, articles and the Royal Commission testimony here on this page. George Pell has withheld evidence from the Royal Commission in regards to crimes against children. I am going put up the info again, and the links. I could do with some help on putting the citations in properly as I am not used to editing Wikipedia. I can see from your home page here that you are used to doing edits.

George Pell is the architect of a global strategy by the Catholic Church put in place by Cardinal Ratzinger to delay and deny crimes against children being heard in Criminal and Civil Courts worldwide. He is now in charge of the Vatican Bank and finances of the Vatican, and has control over whether documents in regards to crimes by Police are released, and has consistently refused to do so, in particular to the Royal Commission in Australia in the last week, in regards to crimes committed when he was the Archbishop in Melbourne and Sydney, and then also as Cardinal.

Can you please refrain from making a judgement call from the place of having absolutely no idea about the issues, just because you can.

These are this weeks newspaper articles, for your information.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/cardinal-george-pell-backs-vatican-over-dealings-with-abuse-victims/story-fni0fee2-1227032175413

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/archbishop-denis-hart-regrets-hurt-caused-by-identical-apology-letters-to-clergy-abuse-victims/story-fni0fit3-1227036445863 Hdawsond (talk) 03:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/parents-of-schoolgirl-victims-upset-by-lawyers-description-of-abuse-as-relatively-minor/story-e6frg6nf-1227031878232# http://rct-law.com.au/legal-blog/2014/letters-of-apology-unchanged-in-13-years

The Royal Commission has heard the evidence in Chrissie and Anthony Foster's case. Chrissie Foster's book http://www.randomhouse.com.au/books/chrissie-foster/hell-on-the-way-to-heaven-9781742753041.aspx An Australian mother's love, the power of the Catholic Church and the fight for justice over child sexual abuse. Summary Chrissie and Anthony Foster were like any other young family, raising their three daughters in suburban Melbourne with what they hoped were the right values. Chrissie could not have known that the stranger-danger she feared actually lurked in the presbytery attached to the girls' Catholic primary school. Father Kevin O'Donnell, a long-term paedophile, lived and worked there. Two of their young daughters became victims of O'Donnell. And once the truth was revealed, the Fosters began a battle to find out how this could have happened. The Church offered silence, lies, denials and threats. Meanwhile, their daughters tried to piece together their fractured lives.

This is the chilling true story that made national and international headlines. Chrissie Foster's heartbreaking account of her family's suffering, and their determination to stand up for themselves against the might of the Catholic Church, is testament to the strength of a mother's love, and the resilience of the human spirit.

Background reading in regards to Canon Law and the Oath taken by all Catholics who work for the Roman Catholic Church to never go to the Police in regards to ANY crime committed by Priests.

http://www.penguin.com.au/products/9780241953846/case-pope Hdawsond (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Globally crimes committed by Priests against children have been brought to the United Nations by SNAP and there is now a Ruling of the UN on Rights of the Child that Religious Child Sex Abuse comes under the Human Rights Rules on Torture, and can be prosecuted by the UN if individual governments fail to act.[reply]

I will put these links in as well. The evidence given by Cardinal Pell at the Victorian Inquiry into Institutional and Religious Child Abuse Hearings in Melbourne were cited in the SNAP evidence and UN Ruling. His evidence has been questioned in Parliament in Victoria recently by the Parlimentarians who held the Inquiry.

This is a serious matter, and I have to put the evidence up here on George's Wikipedia page because it is one of the pages that journalists come to looking for source documents and explanations. So can you please not take it down. Hdawsond (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Factual assertions backed by reliable secondary sources are fine, but when your edits contain Godfather parody images intended to paint Pell as a Mafia hit man you have gone off the rails and fallen afoul of Wikipedia's policy on neutrality. I would like to think you are not here to push an agenda of denigrating Pell and others in the church, but your contributions have given me quite a bit of doubt. Any edits that do not adhere to Wikipedia policy will not be tolerated. Elizium23 (talk) 05:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Hdawsond, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Azadirachta indica has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]