User talk:Hburdon
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
CSI episodes
[edit]Sorry about that. The CSI Project has been working to reduce the over disambiguation of the CSI episodes so the names as shown on the CSI episode list entry were the correct ones. I have moved the relevant entries which should have fixed things. I'll go through them and make use all the next/prevous links work OK too. Thanks for the note. (Emperor 12:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC))
- Thanks for the explanation and sorry for correcting it the wrong way round. CSI is a bit confusing with its numerous lists of episodes in various places. Hburdon 14:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh tell me about it!! ;) It is one of the big things the CSI Wikiproject is trying to fix but there are all sorts of links pointing to a number of entries - we've had some episodes having 2 entries (and one 2 parter with 3). Your note was very helpful as I'd not fixed the relevant entries after putting the list back but it should all be fixed now. We are resigned to the fact that it will take numerous sweeps through and a lot of eyes checking things before we can be sure it is all working smoothly. Why not sign up and pitch in? Wikipedia:WikiProject CSI franchise. (Emperor 14:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC))
Notability of Felonious Monk (musician)
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Felonious Monk (musician), by Erechtheus (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Felonious Monk (musician) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Felonious Monk (musician), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Felonious Monk (musician) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Bogusław
[edit]To start with, can you prove that Bogislaw is the most common English version of that name? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with the unification, but when I searched for the name - also some time ago - it was my conclusion that none is the most common, and hence the original (Polish) makes most sense. Do not that we commonly do not translate first names.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Language - good question, I do not know out of the top of my head. I'd guess many knew both... there was also the Pomeranian language.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
The article King Baby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not a notable episode. Delete to make room for Jim Gaffigan album.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Suckers (CSI) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suckers (CSI) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suckers (CSI) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:02am • 00:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Hburdon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)