User talk:Hazelorb

Re: problematic user

Aside from this thread, no initiative has been made to deal with the editor in particular. Nevertheless, if no action is taken, it might be a good to bring this matter back to WP:AIN. What are your thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we'll give it a few days to see if they actually follow the rules, otherwise that would be a good idea. Hazelorb (talk) 03:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Have you watchlisted the discussion to keep track of it? Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but they have not replied back nor edited the page again... Hazelorb (talk) 01:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I saw Niittymaki's middle name in a Flyers media guide once, but I understand that we need proper and verifiable sources. Like you, I couldn't find a source, although one link did come up but I'm not sure if it is legit. http://www.olympic.neostrada.pl/ols/2006TORnr3.pdf go to page 42. Thanks.--GWST11 (talk) 04:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]