User talk:Haymanpl

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

haymanpl 20:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Not done: this is the talk page for communicating with the user Haymanpl (talk · contribs). Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My advice would be to make a specific proposal, backed by reliable sources discussing cyberbullying in relation to DMCA takedown notices, at Talk:Cyberbullying. Huon (talk) 20:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Jeff Horn

Your repeated changes to that article are unacceptable because Wikipedia content is required to be referenced to reliable sources. HiLo48 (talk) 03:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Scott Morrison

Hi, I undid this edit you made to Scott Morrison as it is a large claim that needs to be backed up by references. Searching on 'NCAT File Number GEN 20/17371 | BRADLEY DALTON - SCOTT MORRISON' turned up no results. Please see WP:BLP and WP:RS for further information. — IVORK _Talk 01:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As before, you need adequate sourcing. If you are going to claim something as strong as under the table deals you are going to need much more than what you provided. In particular, you will need a sufficient reliable secondary published sources to support the claims. - Bilby (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Scott Morrison, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — IVORK _Talk 05:13, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Haymanpl, the fact that a lawsuit exists does not make it automatically suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Anyone can file a lawsuit, you need to show that this one is actually of significance, i.e. through it being covered in the media. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 06:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.pdf

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ncat-scott-morrison-hearing.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Haymanpl! Your additions to Nok Air have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]