User talk:HawkeSeaScouts

Welcome!

Hello, HawkeSeaScouts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

It is great to see you are editing articles on Scouting. If you not already seen it, may I draw your attention to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting. Your articles have already been discussed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting#Sea Scouts New Zealand. I am afraid Ed is right. Sea Scouts New Zealand could be OK, but it needs more than a list of Groups. Indeed that list really should go as I am sure there is a list on an external link. Hawke Sea Scouts is different. There is a clear consensus that individual Groups are not notable. This is discussed on the Scouting Project pages and fits with the general consensus that articles on individual chapters of organisations are not allowed. Normally such articles are merged into articles on Scouting in States, Counties or Provinces. Unfortunately we do not have such articles for New Zealand. Maybe you could write them. See what we have in Australia and UK, although I must say many of the UK County articles are little more than lists of Groups. --Bduke 00:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed the merge of Hawke Sea Scouts to Sea Scouts New Zealand, two article that you started. Please see the discussion on Talk:Sea Scouts New Zealand and add your comments. --Bduke 02:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now had a good look at the Scouting WikiProject and in particular Editing conventions and now see why you are making the suggestion - The problem with the guideline on Local Scouting Articles (BSA) is that, as indicated by its title, it reflects the american model where you may well find articles about the councils which could include details about units. This is very unlikely to happen in NZ. So I would again ask that you consider a slightly different model in order to increase the visibility of scouting in general. HawkeSeaScouts (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Craig, I am going to reply here to your comments on my talk page as you have copied the main one I want to reply to above. First. I do not think your comments were that blunt. As a Yorkshire man I can be much blunter! :-) The problem is not really with the Scouting WikiProject guideline on Local Scouting Articles. The problem is with this dot point:-

Individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not notable enough to warrant a separate article unless sufficient notability is established through reliable sources. However, chapter information may be included in list articles as long as only verifiable information is included.

in Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) which the project guidelines reflects and explains in the Scouting context. Maybe the oldest Sea Scout Group in New Zealand might meet that, but a whole lot of articles, as you suggest, will certainly not. Indeed I am surprised that the Hawke Bay article has not been proposed for deletion already. It is pretty clear that it will not survive long. While Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Local Scouting articles (BSA) is about USA, there is a clear consensus to do something similar to articles from other countries. Indeed I thought we had something more general and international than that and I will look further. Many articles on Groups in the UK, Australia, Singapore and other places have been merged. If you look at the list of proposed merges at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Article watchlist, you will see just below the Hawke Bay entry, two UK Groups articles that have been merged recently. The other problem is getting reliable independent sources. Your link to this site simply does not meet Wikipedia policy. Certainly, the general Sea Scout article is OK, or at least it will be if you add content other than the list of Groups. How is scouting organised below national level in NZ. In Australia it is the States and Territories and we have articles on Scouting in all of them. In UK it is Counties (England) and Scout Areas (Scotland, Wales and NI). Are there Scout structures for places like Otago? I will copy the main parts of this to the merge discussion. Feel free to discuss this further with me on my talk page, or here (it is on my watch list) or by e-mail (I have e-mail set up and there is a link to the left of my user page). Regards, Brian. --Bduke (talk) 08:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you have had a good Christmas. I have copied your articles to ScoutWiki. I think that is the place for group articles. Most of their articles are copies from Wikipedia but they say Group articles are welcome. Happy New Year. --Bduke (talk) 03:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hawke Sea Scout Hall

The article Hawke Sea Scout Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article on Hawke Sea Scouts has already been redirected to Sea Scouts New Zealand because the organisation lacks notability. The building would appear to be less notable than the organisation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. gadfium 05:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eaglemast.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eaglemast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Parrot of Doom 17:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hawke Sea Scout Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hawke Sea Scout Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawke Sea Scout Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gadfium 22:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:HawkeShip.jpg

The file File:HawkeShip.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This file is used on Sea Scouts New Zealand --Bduke (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User name policy

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "HawkeSeaScouts", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Bogger (talk) 11:08, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

While user names that are the names of organizations are not permitted, you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Foundation", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 15:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]