User talk:Havok/archive05

Re: Grand Theft Auto IV

Sorry, I was busy all weekend. Hope it's improved. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked the IP 24 hours for WP:3RR and WP:POINT. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 13:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Anbu_mask.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anbu_mask.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WoWWiki

WoWWiki has been nominated for deletion again. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 11:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zone of the Enders Character

If you support video game characters you may want to visit here Neith Z.O.E. game. Which unfortuantly is nominated for deletion 11:17 10 August 2006 (UTC). ShadowKinght (Talk)

Image tagging for Image:Narutonorwayv2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Narutonorwayv2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Bad faith nomination"

I have no idea what you mean by the term; a nomination that is genuinely made in bad faith would, by definition, be vandalism. If a nomination is plainly vandalism, and no editors have supported it in good faith, you can warn, report, or block the vandal as necessary, tag the nomination with {{db-g3}}, and revert the other edits made in placing it... even if other users have supported it, the vandal should probably still be dealt with somehow. Short of that, though, AfD isn't really the place to make accusations of bad faith. It is a simple process that attracts far too much bad blood already. --Aquillion 19:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warcraft AFD

Hey, I think we've made our point against Kafziel in the Warcraft AFD, and now he appears to be trolling. Let's not feed him, ok? Delete this when you see it and hopefully he won't. JoshWook 17:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD War

Please read my closing (and only remaining) comments on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warcraft character articles page. I think you will agree with me. Kaustuv tried to do a very good thing with this nom, but with a list so incomplete and unorganized, it was doomed to fail. If we get a complete list divided into major and minor, we can put it up to public inquiry and reach an important milestone for AfD/WP:FICT problems in the future. Please respond on my User talk page!

OrcShaman42 20:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I would say you deserve one of these, too. Even though you created it.

		The Warcraft Barnstar
		For your Contributions to Wikiproject Warcraft

-Ed! 04:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I tried giving these out to as many people as possible, but the only people who have really been working on the project lately are OrcShaman42 and myself. And I can't give a barnstar to myself. -Ed! 02:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sega Mega Drive

Move completed. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 12:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use galleries in Warcraft articles

It is strange that you call my gallery removals vandalism. They are not. Fair use does not cover galleries of images that are simply used for decoration. This is not Wikipedia policy, it is U.S. copyright law. Neither The Forsaken (Warcraft) nor Orc (Warcraft) contain any sort of explanation or analysis of the gallery images. There aren't even subtitles explaining what they all are!

It's not that fact that there were images in the article, not that it's about World of Warcraft, not because I'm a rouge admin :). It's only because there was no context, and therefore no valid fair use claim.

This issue has come up before, and my actions aren't out of line. It was just as rash for you to revert my removal without discussion as it might've been for me to make the removal in the first place.

Why do those images have to be in the article? If you can provide some sort of justification, there's no problem. As it is, however, they contribute nothing. So improve the article already, instead of fighting some jerk admin! Caption the images, or put them in appropriate places. I'm sure you and User:CyberSkull can find a way to improve the article.

Also, you should've realized by now that not all of Wikipedia's rules are written down. Policy is a direct result of the community's actions, not the other way around. Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, nor is it an experiment in rule making. Consensus guides, it doesn't dominate. ~MDD 46 96 03:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... and by the way, we're supposed to interpret the rules as we see fit! ~MDD 46 96 03:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Wowwiki

Hi,the screenshot of wowwiki you uploaded is kinda outdated.can you upload the current one please?thanks.(i would love to do it myself but i dont know how to upload it lol)