Jump to content

User talk:HavenHost

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, HavenHost, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Christian msg 15:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naga, Cebu. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Tue 21:10, wikitime= 13:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Unbuttered Parsnip is currently being reported on Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]
It was you who keep on reverting at the first place. You reverted my edits on 3 (just turned 4 as of 14:00, 22 December 2015‎ UTC) different occasions without edit summary. First revert had one though yet vague and unclear so with that being said, consensus never took place. We'll further discuss this in a dispute resolution.
– HavenHost 21:14, 22 December 2015 (PST)
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Naga, Cebu, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.philstar.com/business-usual/2012/06/25/820966/economic-boom-brings-prosperity-cebus-new-cities, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Naga, Cebu saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Fri 12:04, wikitime= 04:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naga, Cebu talk page

[edit]

I have already opened up a discussion regarding this issue. Let's talk and clarify this. HavenHost 04:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating reversions. Now actually positive editing, just reversing others work.

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

See response. Thank you. – User:HavenHost (talk) 2:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC).

Complain about user:HavenHost (again/still)

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 194.75.238.182 (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See response. Thank you. – User:HavenHost 3:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC).

WP:PARANOIA

[edit]

Whoever you are, get real. Mary McAllen (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mary McAllen: I totally understand where you're coming from. Well as far as I know, whoever violates WP:SOCK should be the one to "get real" especially one who uses a female's name which is the other way around. Anyway, why focus on Central Visayas articles? You can contribute more on other Philippine geography articles though. Just saying. HavenHost 2:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
I also believe this user is the same person behind User:Unbuttered Parsnip: edits the same type of articles, often reverts without discussion, and is dismissive of other editors' contributions leading to ownership-like behavior. It's a shame, this person clearly does good edits majority of the time, but the combative behavior is really unproductive. —seav (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly seav! It is indeed a shame because this person has done positive and helpful edits in the past. His only problem is his ownership-like behavior. The guy's very combative and doesn't want to discuss things. He wants to edit articles on his own way and dismisses other editor's contributions. The guys also violates WP:CIVIL a lot of times and does personal attacks. I've already reported this user a number of times for multiple sockpuppets. He's get blocked all the time but keeps coming back. If only he'll participate in discussions to achieve consensus, then edit wars will be avoided moving forward. -HavenHost 5:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

A certain vegetable

[edit]

I see that you & others have had some issues with a certain vegetable being disruptive on Cebu & related articles. Enough investigations have been launched that the veggie might have caught on and changed tactics. If so, y'all might take a cue from Talk:Global_warming/FAQ#Q20. 130.160.195.4 (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, HavenHost. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, HavenHost. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:STCCebuSchoolSeal.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, HavenHost. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HavenHost&oldid=1144358868"