User talk:Hatice w

Welcome!

Hello, Hatice w, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Meco, very helpful. Might take me a while to get up to speed.... :) Hatice w (talk) 15:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gulen's Biography

Hi Hatice, I realized that you have some interest in Gulen's biography. I would like to take the recent discussions (although unpleasant) to your attention. An author (Arnout) is consistently blanking the page, deleting verified information, alienating naive editors, and blocking others from editing. He does not contribute to the article with even a meaningful sentence. If you could review the other version with wider support, more information and references, and compare it with the existing one, you will see the difference in depth of covering the issue. I believe that supporting the older version could help in having a more neutral biography with more informative context. 71.72.81.83 (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed unpleasant that this IP (who was temporarily blocked for vandalism) is trying to get support for his seriously troubled ideas by going to editors talk pages. For your information, all "so called" facts, histories etc. are all, without a single exception, solo actions by a single editor with many aliases (something called sockpuppetry and considered vandalism in Wikipedia). Basically the wider support is User:Philscirel, also known as...... 71.72.81.83 (and many other names). All other editors and administrators do support the other version.

I am sorry this is occurring on your talk, but it is a last desperate effort of an editor who tries to use Wikipedia for his own goals to get his way. Arnoutf (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]