User talk:Hatchiko
Welcome!
Hello, Hatchiko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 23:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Hatchiko! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Bohai
[edit]Хатико ,Я очень рад, что вы можете добавить русские ссылки. Пожалуйста, добавьте эти материалы к английскому названию. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anchuhu (talk • contribs) 09:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- In Russia, these are the countries of Primorsky Krai that are the best researched in the world because they began to study it in 1944. And in their research, there is no political background, unlike other countries. All nations of the region are equally distant from the Russians, and therefore we do not have and cannot legitimize claims on historical grounds.
Therefore, we can honestly argue and describe - what we see. Korea and China are very politicized in matters of states and peoples of the region. And greatly distort the data.
We also wrote hundreds of works - of course in Russian. At 30% of them, the CyberLeninka project has already been digitized in the Lenin Library.
Archaeological material - 187 settlements of different eras excavated. Attributed. Dozens of tons of archaeological materials have been collected and cataloged. There is a national register of archaeological sites.
But in the West, for some reason, everything is ignored. The only ones who collaborate with us are the Japanese. The Koreans began to arrive for ten years. But they are used only as a labor force - because they horribly distort interpretation.Hatchiko (talk) 10:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Я знаю I am a Chinese history buff, know some Russian, but this is English Wikipedia, so please add a description to the reference materials you added, just like other Internet materials, so English readers can also understand Russian research. And, like my point of view, Bohai State and Manchu are part of Tunguska culture, which is different from Han Chinese and Korean cultures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anchuhu (talk • contribs) 10:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- How exactly do this? When you add links to materials that are only in Chinese, how do you do it? Give a template.Hatchiko (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
”[1]”
You can copy this code to the reference material and you can see the effect of referring to different languages.
- Thank you, I will arrange all the links in a couple of days. There is no time now. one link has already madeHatchiko (talk) 12:16, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
According to the relevant information on the Korean Wikipedia, North Korea seems to have more historical claims about the Bohai State. Actually, Bohai is considered to be a purely Korean nation, and whether the information is owned by Russia. Please also put the reference data in a uniform format as soon as possible, and there are many pure links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anchuhu (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Yes, North Korea considers Bohai a Korean state. I understand you have a question? Prove that it considers the Korean state? The work of the Russian scientist of Korean descent. "The history of the state of Bohai according to the research of North Korean scientists will do? Or do you have a question on the borders? wanting to mess around in this shit where the administration doesn't give a shit about everything - and no one really follows the rules of the project. All this is fiction. Well, you all have to live in your fictional world and the Korean Nazis will be calmed by a nuclear bomb. Hatchiko (talk) 08:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC) О мой товарищ I am joking. I am not a subject of the "Cosmic Country". I mean that North Korea seems to have the same opinion as South Korea. Therefore, it is not necessary to refer to south Korea alone. And there are references to the processing of information. Adding their topics is not simply chain However, currently locked in the most complete version, you need to unlock to edit
Soviet occupation of Mongolia
[edit]Hello, I am editing this article, but I need some reference materials in Russian. Can you help me find some related information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:8A10:1644:6080:DD0F:40C3:228D:8DA (talk) 02:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, we have worked together in Bohai on Wikipedia. Now, please edit the page of Soviet occupation of Mongolia. You added the delete template, but this page is obviously translated from the Russian version of Wikipedia.I also think that the title is not appropriate, can you change the title to "Mongolian Action", the title is neutral and translated directly from Russian Монгольская операция,in any case, the Soviet Red Army played an irreplaceable role in the Mongolian People’s Revolution, which is also recognized by Mongolia. Russian Wikipedia has this page indicating that this event is also present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:8A10:1644:6080:DD0F:40C3:228D:8DA (talk) 01:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- It is not true. In the Russian version of Wikipedia, we are talking about the participation of Soviet troops in the civil war in Mongolia - and this is not occupation at all. This is the subsection "The Civil War in Mongolia" which has grown and a separate article has been highlighted.Bogd Khanate of Mongolia this state, although not recognized by the Chinese governments, nevertheless existed as an independent state. In which the German baron Ungern moved to the service of the governor together with the army. After the defeat of the government of Kolchak. Since he was an ideological opponent of the Communists, after the government of the Mongolian People’s Party requested assistance from the RSFSR, troops were sent. They did not occupy anything, but fought on the side of the Mongolian communists just like Ungern and its troops fought on the side of the anti-communists.
It is obvious that I will not help to support that article which is not a description of the civil war in Mongolia, but describes a non-existent invasion of Soviet troops into China.
The USSR invaded China but in 1929 on the CER when China tried to annex the railway. And then the White Army was no longer fighting on the side of China. It is not since 1922. But the citizens of China. Former soldiers of the White Army. Similarly, in Paraguay Chaco_War, the White Army did not fight — but the former members of the White Army were citizens of Paraguay. Similarly, in Mongolia, Ungern - German baron. He was no longer a citizen of Russia, but was a citizen of Mongolia. He became the equivalent of the Prime Minister. That a foreign citizen obviously can not. similarly changed the identity of the troops transferred from the Army of Denikin to Democratic Republic of Georgia. They ceased to be white at the moment when they became the troops of the Georgian Republic. analogically Ukrainian State those who later became part of the White Army while they were in the army of this unrecognized state were not White. Hatchiko (talk) 04:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Goguryeo, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- You are the ones who violate the rules of the project - neutrality and accuracy of edits. A complaint will be sent to your actions.Hatchiko (talk) 13:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koraskadi (talk • contribs) 00:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- ^ "Название статьи" [Название статьи переведено на английский язык]. Исходный сайт. 3 February 2016. Retrieved 2 February 2019.