User talk:Hashimashadoo

You built a computer yourself? You must be a genious! ‡ Jarlaxle 21:19, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Invitation to the Forgotten Realms project

Hi,

We are working on a Forgotten Realms Project to map Toril (mostly Faerûn, at the present). Since you contributed quite a lot on a Forgotten Realms-specific entry, I'd like to invite you to join the project, so we could improve the “Mapping the Realms” project.

The goal is to create a sort of World Factbook for the Realms. This means:

A consistent content
Use of templates
Entries should be limited to “sovereign places”: states and free cities, as well a moderately-inhabited place such as the Western Highlands.

On top of this, we also plan to cover Lost Empires, such as Pelvuria or Imaskar and, of course, Netheril

The project is located here
The Geographical index of Toril is a good start to get a visual of had been done, as well as the Halruaa entry.

Main contributors are presently

If you know some other person who would be interested, feel free to forward the invitation!

Feel free to take a look. We hope to see you soon mapping the Realms with us! Reply to David Latapie 12:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An offer of sorts

Hi,

They had been two answers to your offer. Read on… Reply to David Latapie 09:56, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding you request for help: you should better post this request on Forgotten Realms WikiProject's talk page Reply to David Latapie 18:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bart Simpson's Guide to Life

The article Bart Simpson's Guide to Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 09:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's approach to sourcing

Hi, I'm moving this discussion here to avoid derailing Talk:LGB_Alliance any further. I would like to strongly encourage you to read WP:OR and in particular WP:PRIMARY. I'm sorry to be blunt but your statements about sourcing are almost the exact opposite of the actual policies, you need to understand in particular that we "Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so."

I understand from your statement "primary sources trump secondary ones - as is the case in all historical research" that you may be used to a different sourcing approach in another context but that isn't what we follow here, this is an encyclopedia, not an historical research project. JaggedHamster (talk) 20:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mirabar" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mirabar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 25 § Mirabar until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 19:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]