User talk:Haruvy
This is Haruvy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
AfC notification: Draft:Buyer-determined Auctions has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Buyer-determined Auctions has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)December 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cognitive hierarchy theory—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Dear Flyer22 Reborn, I am sorry you undid my edit to Cognitive hierarchy theory. I am the original author of THAT section and I edited it with a link to the new page I created. If you don't restore my edit, a new page I created for Leve-k theory will be deleted due to minor overlap with that section. Level-k is not a subset of cognitive hierarchy. It is a competing theory.
Thanks!
Professor Ernan HAruvy
Speedy deletion nomination of Ido Erev
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ido Erev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mba.technion.ac.il/prof-ido-erev/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Schazjmd (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- I've removed the remaining content that was copied, and removed the tag. An administrator will delete the versions of the article that contain the copyright violation. Please only write articles in your own words. Articles should summarize reliable sources but must not copy from them. Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions, or visit the Teahouse which offers advice to new editors. You might also try the Wikipedia Adventure, a guided learning experience. Schazjmd (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 01:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Level k theory moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Level k theory, as you appear to be one of the inventors of this concept. It is highly recommended that editors with conflicts of interest submit their articles from draftspace through the Articles for Creation process. Additionally, the article as written has insufficient citations to sources independent of D. O. Stahl and E. Haruvy; such independent sources are required in order to demonstrate a subject's notability on Wikipedia, and articles about scientific concepts should be primarily based on such reviews, not on the original publications pioneering a body of theory. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguill talk 21:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Level k theory
[edit]Hello, Haruvy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Level k theory".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Simha Haruvi moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Simha Haruvi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Simha Haruvi
[edit]Hello, Haruvy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simha Haruvi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Simha Haruvi
[edit]Hello, Haruvy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simha Haruvi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)