User talk:Hartenhof

Welcome

You are welcome to leave me a message. Hartenhof (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation request for Eyjafjallajökull

Could you provide a citation for [1]. I couldn't find one? --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 15:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I can help you, I found lots of them, look at these two Icelandic examples among many more : [2] and : [3]. As you probably know, jökull means glacier, and the Eyjafjallajökull glacier covers the Guðnasteinn vulcano. Hartenhof (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like a source as well.
I've looked at the sources you have here, and neither of them say the volcano is named Guðnasteinn. (the first is a picture of Hamundur, taken from Gudnasteinn; the second tells a legend of the place (as far as I can tell; I'm using google translation).
There was an interminable discussion on the talk page about this, and the only conclusion arrived at was that most sources use "Eyjafjallajökull" as the name for the volcano. If you have anything to the contrary, perhaps you would join the discussion. Moonraker12 (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was there in 2006 and 2009, on top of this very glacier. I am aware of the fact that most sources use the name Eyjafjallajökull for the volcano. This misunderstanding emerged as soon as the eruption occurred. Still it is only the name of the "jökull" (glacier). As using the false name has established itself as common practice now, it seems rather useless to try and establish the real name. So I am prepared to let it go, as long as you and I know better... our little secret... Hartenhof (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm: I was mainly asking for a source for this, as I don't think it is correct.

I don’t know what you were told when you were there, but (I've been doing some digging) the Iceland National Land Survey‘s map here shows a volcanic crater (called Eyjafjallajokull), which has three separate peaks around the rim (clockwise, Hamandur, Gudnasteinn, Godasteinn).

That isn’t unusual for a volcano, but the name of the highest peak (or even the highest crater!) doesn’t usually name the mountain as a whole. Uhuru Peak, on Kibo, doesn’t apply to Kilimanjaro as a whole [4], for example; and Columbia Crest isn’t the name by which Mt Rainier is known [5].

In any case, Hamandur (which seems to translate as “Main Peak”) is higher than Gudnasteinn; and there seems to be some confusion (see here) as to which peak is which... Moonraker12 (talk) 12:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS I've taken the liberty of removing it from the article, as long as you don't mind Moonraker12 (talk) 12:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PPS It does look like a fascinating place! Moonraker12 (talk) 12:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. it really IS fascinating, and of course I don't mind. Hartenhof (talk) 13:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Barrino Brothers may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed them. You could have done that yourself in a nanosecond, but thanks anyway. Hartenhof (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hunt

Just so you know, my comment at Talk:Tim Hunt#How to correct the mistake and get Sir Tim Hunt back into his scientific positions? wasn't aimed at you. The issue is more with the initiator of the discussion, as can be seen by the title of the thread. Yaris678 (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I appreciate that. I agree with you that Wikipedia is not the place for actions or demonstrations. But I accepted the challenge and wrote a short paragraph that should be sufficient. Thanks again, Hartenhof (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleigh Brewer

Hi,

I have undone your edit to Ashleigh Brewer. We cannot include screenshots in BLP articles. The reason being is that the screenshot is copyrighted to the corporation that produce Neighbours. It can be used on Kate's article because under US Copyright Law it qualifies as fair use because it is describing the contents of the programme. It cannot be used in a BLP - as Ashleigh is a living person there may be a free alternative and it may also be seen as a copyright infringement. I suggest reading Wikipedia:Non-free content.--5 albert square (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me. To me "copyright" is a foreign country... they do things differently there... ;-) Hartenhof (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Catherina van Rennes a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Catharina van Rennes. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comments. My mistake was that I changed Catherine to Catherina, actually wanting to change it to Catharina, which was her correct name. I don't understand why she was called Catherine here in the first place. So, when I found out my mistake, I had to change the page's title again, as well as the redirects and the talk page. I think I'd better stay out of it now, to avoid further confusion, and ask an administrator to do what's needed. Sorry about this, Hartenhof (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sir Tim Hunt controversy at WCSJ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sir Tim Hunt controversy at WCSJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from jaymaron.com/badass.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

Gelieve mij niet te pingen als je weet dat ik niet kan reageren. Dat je nu spreekt over mijn reactie op jou eerdere onnodige bronwisseling als 'getier' is zeer laag, maar zo kennen we je weer. Ophouden met pingen, dus. Eissink (talk) 09:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Wees eerlijk, was het geen getier? Ik kende je nog niet, maar ik vond de kennismaking onprettig, al werkte je me op de lachspieren. ik dacht dat het door het nachtelijke tijdstip kwam. Ik beloof plechtig dat ik je niet meer zal pingen zolang je niet gekalmeerd bent. Hartenhof (talk) 10:17, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voor sommigen, die tegenspraak niet kennen of willen dulden, is wellicht elke onverwachte tegenwerping als getier. Je mag je proberen voor te stellen hoe de kennismaking, die jij initieerde, voor mij was, maar dat zal wel te veel gevraagd zijn. Eissink (talk) 10:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Initieerde ik? Ik reageerde op een vijandige bewerkingssamenvatting van een onbekende. Ben je nu van plan deze Engelstalige user page hiermee te gaan vullen? Ik ben hier voor mijn rust. ;-) Hartenhof (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jij vond het toch nodig een valide bron in te wisselen voor een andere bron? Die BTNI-actie was een daad van agressie, maar ik begrijp al dat je geen tegenspraak gewend bent en dat je het met de geschiedenis niet al te nauw neemt als dat in je nadeel zou kunnen zijn. Een waardeloze instelling, dat mag dan nog wel even gezegd worden, want dat is het. Succes er maar mee, want het is het kliekje eigenbelangers gelukt mij van de Nederlandse Wikipedia te verwijderen, dus je kunt mijn bestaan verder wel vergeten, als je dat comfortabel en rustig vindt. Blijf de zaak dus maar fijn op je eigen manier verdraaien, ik zie het van een afstandje ook wel gebeuren en zal er mijn rust aan ontlenen. Gegroet, Eissink (talk) 10:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help Request, pretty please

Hello! You seem to be a major expert on classical music through wikipedia, so was wondering if you could help a little with this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:George_Jackson_(conductor)

It is currently a draft being reviewed.

Many thanks, and Happy Friday! Jacksogh1987 (talk) 13:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]