User talk:Harsh Shailesh Shah

Welcome!

Hello, Harsh Shailesh Shah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Madhura Naik have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edits

Please stop over-writing the Madhura Naik article with unsourced and promotional material. Your edits have repeatedly been reverted as they do not comply with Wikipedia policy regarding living persons, reliable sourcing and neutrality. In addition, you are inexplicably adding a semi-protection template that doesn't belong on the article. As you have been reverted multiple times by multiple editors, you need to use the article talk page to get consensus for the changes you would like to make.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for the continued introduction of unsourced personal information to a biography article. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]