User talk:Harryg2900
February 2015
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to White Russia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: White Russia was changed by Harryg2900 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954015 on 2015-02-16T17:59:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at White Russia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 18:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 18:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Amortias (T)(C) 18:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Harryg2900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I GOT BLOCKED BECAUSE I BROKE A PAGE WITH SPAM. IM REALLY SORRY AND I PROMISE NEVER TO DO IT AGAIN. YOU HAVE NOT SPECIFIED WHAT OTHER REASONS IT IS INQDEQUATE FOR.If it was an accident it isn't needed to stop damage because i can't hurt a website if it was an accident and i understand the accident and i won't accidentally do it again and i will make useful stuff not accidents there let me edit again nowHarryg2900 (talk) 19:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 19:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.