User talk:Harry 88r
January 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth O'Keefe (2nd nomination) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 08:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kenneth O'Keefe. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. cymru.lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 04:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)