User talk:HarmonicSeries

Welcome!

Hello, HarmonicSeries! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dabomb87 (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank You From StudiousReader

I am gradually realizing that some pages don't require strict adherence to policy, while OTHERS (like the sex abuse one) require extreme adherence. Thanks for pointing this out. --StudiousReader (talk) 07:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Typo at RealClimate

Please note that one of your recent additions has a small typo: "considers RealClimate.org the "the ...". The word "the" is duplicated. I would make the change myself except that there is some question regarding whether this page is related to my current editing restriction on "William Connolley-related" (the real world person, not the wikipedia editor even though that may sound confusing) pages. --GoRight (talk) 20:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made a small edit here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming#Believe_global_warming_is_not_occurring_or_has_ceased

by replacing a short term climate graph with a long term geological temperature graph:

to show that warming has been natural in the past, but not necessarily proving that current warming is not caused by humans today.

The same group of people are busy reverting even this simple edit. The article already had one short term graph. I thought a long term graph would be more appropriate. My current edit includes the two short term graphs and the long term graph.

Take care when removing sources

See [1] reverting [2]. Perhaps you searched for 'tree ring' or something but in any case, a reminder to take care when removing sources and make sure you look carefully. If searching for words, remember possible alternative spellings etc. If article isn't particularly long, may be wise just to read it if you still can't find anything Nil Einne (talk) 05:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Jones

In my opinion, the BBC link provided is sloppy reporting, but WP relies on reliable sources, and it qualifies. Please do not revert again, as certain people are looking for excuses to ban people.--SPhilbrick T 18:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]