User talk:Harmless rebellion

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Ragib 08:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during November 2 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Luna Santin 00:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tourlibentrance.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tourlibentrance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 14:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Kaylan

Alright no problem, I believe I was reverting some vandalism anyway, glad you caught my mistake. :) Renaissancee (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help!

Sure, just wait a few hours, I'm at school right now. GSMR (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Renu Desai. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should also review WP:Civil as evident in this edit. Toddst1 (talk) 05:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]